answers for a case 'who pays the price'
1. In each of the three scenarios presented in the case, opponents and proponents have divergent views of government regulations. One view is on the public benefit, the other is on the cost to private industry. How can you decide which view to accept?
2. In each of the scenarios above, identify the benefits versus the costs for both viewpoints.
3. Should the government intervene in setting regulations to increase security and help the environment? Or should private industry take on this role?
Answers
Answered by
0
Answer:
to big question this is i think so
Answered by
0
Answer:
ok I saw the question but I got bored reading it so I'm sorry idk the answer
Similar questions