any five questionnaires to be asked to the experts of history for nepal
Answers
Answer:
Who founded Nepal?
How Nepal got it's name?
Who was the first king of Nepal?
What is the Old name of Nepal?
Was Nepal Ruled by British?
Answer:
Ques1. What can be proved through historical evidence is that a non-Sanskrit-speaking dynasty was ruling in Kathmandu Valley at least during the first or second century A.D. The inscriptions of the subsequent period, which are invariably in the Sanskrit language, refer to a number of places, taxes, government offices, etc. with non-Sanskritic names.
Ans1. This non-Sanskrit-speaking dynasty has been given the name of Kirata on the testimony of the Vamsavalis. Attempts have been made to show that the Kiratas were an ethnic communicy, of the same stock as'the present-day Kiratas of the eastern hill region. However, ancient writings, inscriptions, and Vamsavalis using the term Kirata were all the products of people of an Indo-Aryan cultural background Who came to Kathmandu Valley from the south. It is perhaps too much to expect these authors to have possessed an accurate knowledge of the ethnology of this region. They used the term Kirata to mean mountain-dwellers in general.ll If this hypothesis is not correct,
______________________________________________________
Ques2. Should we say that there were only Kiratas in Kathmandu Valley and the peripheral areas during the early years of the Christian era?
Ans2. Inaccuracy of ethnological terminology because of ignorance was not confined to ancient and medieval Nepal. In our own days, we use the term "Madise" to denote the inhabitants of the Terai re-gion, irrespective of their actual ethnic status. Similarly, the term Bhote is used to denote all communities of Tibetan stock. An-other example is furnished by the use of the term Newar after 1768; the term, which originally denoted nationality; was thereafter used to denote a caste.
_______________________________________________________
Ques3. What the twentienth-century historian of this medieval period has to try to do is to account for this 'otherness' without recourse to unsubstantiated theories of cataclysmic break." J.J. Bagley makes the same point when he says that the modern period in English history commenced not in 1485 but from the middle decades of the six-teenth century, when "the distinctive pattern of modern social life" started emerging.?
Ans3. Geoffrey Barraclough26 has. remarked: "It is, indeed, a major question whether we can devise any scheme of chronology which is applicable to every country or to every people at once." If the criterion for distinguishing between the mediaeval period and the modern period in history is the transition toward "a distinctive pattern of social life," it may be valid to put forward the view that the modern period in Nepali history commenced during the middle of the nineteenth century, when Rana rule emerged in Nepal.
___________________________
Am extremly sorry I just got 3 hope u got the other 2 questions from the other user :)
Have a good day
Explanation: