Are Biological Weapons More Dangerous Than Nuclear Weapons? What Is The Current State Of Biological Weapons Research?
no spam ❌
Answers
Answered by
1
Answer:
That is an answer which cannot be and search Soi sleep biological weapons and nuclear weapons are both very dangerous we can say is that coronavirus is a biological weapon and it was affected the world world nuclear weapons are dangerous to the Great nuclear bombsthat is an answer which cannot be and search Soi sleep biological weapons and nuclear weapons are both very dangerous we can say is that coronavirus is a biological weapon and it was affected the world world nuclear weapons are dangerous to the great nuclear bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki me has white way many people's lives so I think both of them are very bad
Answered by
4
- It is true that biological weapons and are more dangerous than nuclear weapons This explains that biological weapons are much more dangerous than the nuclear weapons. Biological weapons have the power to destroy the massive population of species than nuclear weapons.
- There are 183 states parties to the BWC, including Palestine, and four signatories (Egypt, Haiti, Somalia, and Syria). Ten states have neither signed nor ratified the BWC (Chad, Comoros, Djibouti, Eritrea, Israel, Kiribati, Micronesia, Namibia, South Sudan and Tuvalu).
Similar questions