History, asked by deeptisomasekar8125, 8 months ago

Are literary sources more useful than archaeological sources for writing history?

Answers

Answered by shreya2908

Answer:

Literary sources are more useful than archeological sources for writing history. ... Literary sources are more useful than archaeological sources because they provide detailed information on the objects and events of the past.

hope you got your answer so please Mark me as the brainliest..........

Previous Question

Next Question

Similar questions

Social Sciences, 4 months ago

what art can you see on rocks in an archaeological site...

English, 4 months ago

what did the peasant do after his breas was stolen...

Science, 4 months ago

Tick (√) the correct answer from given option: 1.what does a mosquito do when it bites us ? a) It pinches us b) It bites off a place of flesh c) It tackle us d) It such blood from our body 2. The earth everything toward it. a) Air around the ball pushes it down b)The earth everything toward it c) the bowl is filled with air and heavy d) The ball is made of rubber...

Sociology, 8 months ago

REASONS FOR THE POLL TAX ORDINANCE...

Biology, 8 months ago

Make a chart if life span if various organisms found in your area?

Social Sciences, 11 months ago

what is the multipurpose river valley project ?explain its main objective.

English, 11 months ago

motivation for job position Field Rregistration assistance...

Math, 11 months ago

Fun easy following during the distributive solve the property 371x105 ...