Question

Are the things mentioned by James Rachels are applicable in your life?Or in yourcommunity? Why or why not?​

Answer 1

James Rachels' piece “The Challenge of Cultural Relativism” is a compelling analysis of the widespread theory and, particularly, where it appears to be flawed. He refutes the idea that there is no “objective standard” for judging moral codes (56).

mark ❤️

Answer 2

Answer:

According to James Rachels's philosophy, "The first thing to notice is that there is a certain type of argument at the centre of Cultural Relativism." Cultural relativists argue from facts about differences in cultural outlooks to a conclusion regarding the status of morality as a strategy.

Explanation:

As a result, we are asked to adopt the following logic:

• The Greeks thought it was wrong to consume the dead, whilst the Galatians thought it was acceptable.

• As a result, neither eating the dead is inherently right nor objectively immoral. It's only a matter of personal preference, which varies by culture.

Moral codes are different for different cultures.

In terms of morality Right and wrong are just points of view, and viewpoints differ from culture to culture. This is referred to as the Cultural Differences Argument.

We would never come to such a conclusion because we recognise that certain cultures' people may just be mistaken in their worldviews.

There is no reason to believe that everyone must be aware of the fact that the world is round.

Similarly, there is no reason to believe that if moral truth exists, everyone must be aware of it.

The main flaw in the Cultural Differences Argument is that it tries to draw a substantive conclusion about a topic based on the fact that people disagree about it.

Hence, the philosophy of James Rachels is applicable in real life.

#SPJ3