Question

Are these non-state institutions connected to the government? If yes, how? If no, why not?​

Answer 1

Answer:

in a democratic country, major industries must be under the control of the state, like banks, petroleum, transportation, and communication because they are  vital  in  the  economy  of  the  country.  However,  in  the  recent  years,  the  said industries  are  being  sold  to  private  entities  to  carry  away  the  burden  from  its operation  and  maintenance.  Today,  private  corporations  headed  by  executives controls  the  major  industries  in  the  country  with  very  minimum  government supervision,  most  of  these  are  petroleum  (Shell,  Caltex  and  Petron), telecommunication  (Smart,  Globe  and  PLDT),  transportation  (Cebu  Pacific  and Philippine  Air  Lines),  etc.  These  entities  significantly  affect  the  lives  of  the  people either directly or indirectly (Baleña 2016)

Explanation:

The greatest difference is State institutions have access to violent coercion to control the actions of others while nongovernment institutions do not.

Slightly less importance is that State institutions have access to government funds taken by force from others while nongovernment institutions do not.

In both cases, nonetheless, the people involved will act to serve themselves to the extent they are permitted to do so. This leads to bureaucratic rigidity.

State institutions cannot go bankrupt while nonstate institutions can.

#SPJ2

Answer 2

• Major industries, such as banks, petroleum, transportation, and communication, must be under state control in a democratic society since they are critical to the country's economy.
• However, in recent years, the aforementioned industries have been sold to private corporations to relieve the burden of their management and up keep.
• Private firms led by CEOs now control the country's key industries with very little government oversight, the majority of which include petroleum (Shell, Caltex, and Petron), telecommunication (Smart, Globe, and PLDT), transportation (Cebu Pacific and Philippine Air Lines), and so on.
• These entities have a considerable impact on people's life, either directly or indirectly (Balea 2016).
• The most significant distinction is that state organisations have access to violent force in order to control the conduct of others, where as nongovernmental organisations do not.
• State institutions, on the other hand, have access to government cash extorted from others, whilst nongovernment institutions do not.
• Regardless, the people concerned will behave to serve themselves to the extent that they are permitted to do so in both circumstances. This results in bureaucratic inflexibility.
• Non-state institutions can fail, but state institutions cannot.

What is a non-state institution in government?

• This are groups and organizations which operate outside the support of any state or government.
• They are referred to be 'stateless' since they are considered to be independent of any state, although, they usually collaborate with the government in implementing projects.

How different is a non-state institution from a state in?

• State institutions are those endorsed and supported by a central state, and part of the formal state structure.
• Non-state institutions are those that operate outside of the formal support and endorsement of the state structure, though they might be recognised to some extent within that formal structure.

#SPJ2