Are these sentences synecdoche or metonymy? "Lend me your ears" and "give me a hand." Please explain why.
Answers
Answer:
Metonymy
Explanation:
What are synecdoche and metonymy? Well, here are their definitions, along with some examples:
Synecdoche
"a figure of speech by which a part is put for the whole or the whole for a part"
Examples (found from Your Dictionary, but slightly changed):
The word “bread” can be used to represent food or money. Bread is just a small area of food, but is used to represent the whole.
The word "wheels" refers to a vehicle. (He bought a new pair of wheels). Again, this is only part of the vehicle, but used to name the whole.
If a country wins a medal at the Olympics, it's common to say that "America won silver", or "France won gold". They are referring only to that country's team, not the whole country, so this is an example of a whole for a part.
Answer:
These sentences are examples of a metonymy
Explanation:
Metonymy is referring to something closely related dun sa dinedescribe na object, PERO HINDI SIYA PART ng dinedescribe niya, it's only associated with it.
"Lend me your ears"
> Ears stand for attention, now ask yourself. Is ears part of attention? No. Then it is a metonymy since it only refers to something closely related with the actual object, and using that as a way to refer to the object itself. Although “ears” are part of a person, they are not being used to describe the whole here. Instead, “ears” represents attention and notice.
"Give me a hand"
>Hand stands for help, now ask yourself again. Is hand part of help? No. Then it is a metonymy. it is a metonym, as hand stands in for help--something that is associated with hands but hands are not a part of help. Although “hand” is a part of a person, they are not being used to describe the whole here. Instead, “hand” stand in for help.