English, asked by bhargavisharma007, 1 year ago

are zoo necessary for the protection or conservation of some species of animals? are they useful for educating the public? are there alternatives to zoo​

Answers

Answered by maheshsaritha381
181

They provide protection for endangered species that are no longer present in the wild, free from the pressures of habitat loss, starvation and predators. ... This means that animals often have to be transferred between different zoos.

The Zoo is very necessary place for some animals to stay safe as they could be hunted down, poisoned by some wild food, or could drown in water in the forest. They also create awareness among the public about the nature of animals and make people friendly with animals. However, a zoo is not the correct substitute for a forest. In a zoo, an animal would feel caged, bound, and not free to roam about in the wild. It is for this reason that wildlife sanctuaries and national parks have been instituted in order to conserve several endangered species. These places provide protection as well as natural surroundings to these species. They can roam about freely in their habitat and are safe too. The public can visit these parks and get educated about the animals and their lifestyles. The parks and sanctuaries are run using a strict set of rules, the most prominent being the ban on hunting. Since the animals are in the open, visitors are not allowed to feed them and would not misbehave or try to play with them as they are under strict guidance. Such incidents have been recorded in zoos where people irritate and tease the animals. Hence, a wild life sanctuary is a good alternative for animals to be safe as well as to live freely in their natural surroundings.Read

Zoos are able to educate the public and inform about important biodiversity issues. Zoos and aquariums do teach the public about the delicate balance between animal species and their habitats, a new international study shows. ... People clearly do not view keeping animals in cages for public display as defending biodiversity.

Are there alternatives to zoos?

Visit a sanctuary. There are many sanctuaries that provide lifetime care for rescued, abused, unwanted or discarded animals. ... Be careful however, because there are substandard zoos and wildlife exhibits that call themselves sanctuaries, but are not. Visit or Volunteer at a Wildlife Rescue or Rehabilitation Centre.


bhargavisharma007: tq..
shanaya8658: its ok
bhargavisharma007: i wanted ans for this topic at least 1 to 2 pages
maheshsaritha381: It's my pleasure
maheshsaritha381: Should I edit it
bhargavisharma007: if u can plz...i want ans for this at least 2 pages..
maheshsaritha381: Now????
bhargavisharma007: before.may 8plz
maheshsaritha381: I have edited it
maheshsaritha381: Is it enough
Answered by priyanshijainap7
109

Answer:

Zoos are necessary as it helps to protect the species. It also helps to educate the people but keeping animals away from there natural habitat is also not good. Therefore, by building national parks,wildlife sanctuary, biosphere animals can be protected as well as they can live in their natural habitat and also there presence can educate us .

Explanation:..

Similar questions