arguments against democracy
Answers
Answered by
39
argument against democracy
1. Change of leaders lead to instability.
2. Only political competition, no scope for morality.
3. Consulting more people leads to delays.
4. Ordinary people don't know that what is good for them.
5. Leads to corruption.
1. Change of leaders lead to instability.
2. Only political competition, no scope for morality.
3. Consulting more people leads to delays.
4. Ordinary people don't know that what is good for them.
5. Leads to corruption.
harshita114:
please mark my answer as brainlist
Answered by
12
Hi friend ......
1) ...Democracy is essentially about masses and majority. It does not take collective intelligence of mass into consideration. Therefore if masses are illiterate the democracy tend to produce awful result. Ex - Pakistan.....
The strongest argument against democracy is a five minute discussion with the average voter. - Winston Churchill.
(2) Politicians the other hand focus only on securing no. and as a result resort to what is popular vs what is right. Ex. Minority appeasement tactics played in India.
(3) Democracy being out delays (read inefficiency) in governance since politicians have to take approval from masses. Ex. Growth of India vs China.
(4) In general masses vote and then their responsibility is considered over. They are not held accountable. If a corrupt person is elected we do not see masses held accountable for this. It is somehow again attributed to the “system”.
hope it helps you..
1) ...Democracy is essentially about masses and majority. It does not take collective intelligence of mass into consideration. Therefore if masses are illiterate the democracy tend to produce awful result. Ex - Pakistan.....
The strongest argument against democracy is a five minute discussion with the average voter. - Winston Churchill.
(2) Politicians the other hand focus only on securing no. and as a result resort to what is popular vs what is right. Ex. Minority appeasement tactics played in India.
(3) Democracy being out delays (read inefficiency) in governance since politicians have to take approval from masses. Ex. Growth of India vs China.
(4) In general masses vote and then their responsibility is considered over. They are not held accountable. If a corrupt person is elected we do not see masses held accountable for this. It is somehow again attributed to the “system”.
hope it helps you..
Similar questions