Political Science, asked by Esha9810, 11 months ago

Arguments for the favour of min education criteria for contesting election

Answers

Answered by itzBrainlyBoy
10

Explanation:

Almost for every post in our country, educational qualification of a person is verified. Then why not politicians! They are ones who forms the Government and run the country. For this, they need to understand how economy functions and runs. These knowledge can be better acquired by education. So, what I mean is there should be a certain educational qualification for becoming a politician. They are the discision maker of the country and education helps to take diplomatic discision in any situation. Education helps to communicate in a convenient way.

Answered by Anonymous
9

Answer:

The first principle of John Rawls's political justice theory is that every citizen should have the same chance to be elected to every - also the highest - office. One can already think about whether a lack of qualification for such an office can be a reason not to follow this principle. How does modern (democratic) society help itself?

The first principle of John Rawls's political justice theory is that every citizen should have the same chance to be elected to every - also the highest - office. One can already think about whether a lack of qualification for such an office can be a reason not to follow this principle. How does modern (democratic) society help itself?Firstly, it strives to ensure that - as far as possible - all its citizens receive a high level of general education through school. Second, officials in high political positions have a staff of counsellors who should be highly qualified. A poorly educated president can nevertheless often ridicule himself, despite his advisors, if he does not know simple facts.

The first principle of John Rawls's political justice theory is that every citizen should have the same chance to be elected to every - also the highest - office. One can already think about whether a lack of qualification for such an office can be a reason not to follow this principle. How does modern (democratic) society help itself?Firstly, it strives to ensure that - as far as possible - all its citizens receive a high level of general education through school. Second, officials in high political positions have a staff of counsellors who should be highly qualified. A poorly educated president can nevertheless often ridicule himself, despite his advisors, if he does not know simple facts.What qualifications does the most powerful office need, or what does the country lack most - despite having counsellors? I think it is the temptation to act, unwise or unjustly, sometimes to one's own advantage (or the advantage of a particular interest group). Political action is always associated with conflicts, complex contexts and dilemmas - how to make a fair decision? The question is whether an educational course can help here, even if it may be useful. One should know something about ethical behaviour and the danger of its violation by political action. For example, that certain groups in society do not benefit from something in the short term, but that in the long term it has rather negative effects on the whole of society,

I hope this will help

Similar questions