English, asked by Shailajaa, 19 days ago

article about 'climate change is not the greatest threat in human history. reasons.'​

Answers

Answered by shubhendraojhasmhs
0

Answer:

Please read below

Explanation:

invalid question +₹)+error+₹+&_

Answered by letmeanswer12
0

Explanation:

                      In early October the United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the world's definitive scientific body on the topic, published, “Global Warming of 1.5C.”  Over 90 scientists from 40 countries reviewing 6,000 studies prepared the IPCC report in response to a 2015 Paris climate accord request.  Its purpose was to discriminate between the effects of global warming at 1.5°C (2.7°F) versus 2.0°C (3.6°F).  The Paris accord called for holding warming below 2.0°C while pursuing efforts to limit it to 1.5°C.  For example, should temperatures increase to 1.5°C, the report found of 105,000 species studied, four percent of vertebrates, six percent of insects and eight percent of plants would lose half of their climatically-determined geographic range.  At 2°C the percent's double to triple.  At 1.5°C we will lose 70 to 90 percent of coral reefs, at 2°C there will be a 99 percent loss. The IPCC report is just one of the latest in an increasing number of publications by leading national and international science bodies that conclude all life on this planet is under existential threat.  What does the IPCC report and the subsequently published 4th National Climate Assessment and Lancet's “Countdown on Health and Climate Change,” the 2017 “Climate Science Special Report” (CCSR), and the 2016 Obama Administration report titled “The Impacts of Climate Change on Human Health in the United States; A Scientific Assessment,” conclude relative to the effects of global warming on human health?

Similar questions