As in cameras picture is in pixels like that can anyone tell our eyes is in how any pixels.
Answers
Answer:
Since human eyes are a biological optical sensor that works about as different as something could compared to a mechanical/ digital optical sensor and lense there is no definable resolution to which would be more image data than what our eyes can see but there are some estimates for sure.
Since human eyes are a biological optical sensor that works about as different as something could compared to a mechanical/ digital optical sensor and lense there is no definable resolution to which would be more image data than what our eyes can see but there are some estimates for sure.Dr. Roger Clark a well known photographer and scientist had this very same question and he had to test it and his results are pretty remarkable. He calculated a person with perfect 20/20 vistion can see “Approximately” 575 million pixels ( equivalent ) of imagery if directly compared to a regular digital camera and how it would take, store, and process photographs. Ok so 575 million pixels that's an enormous amount of detail in a single image that would use up anywhere 350–700 Mb of data per image if a regular photograph camera was ever invented.
Since human eyes are a biological optical sensor that works about as different as something could compared to a mechanical/ digital optical sensor and lense there is no definable resolution to which would be more image data than what our eyes can see but there are some estimates for sure.Dr. Roger Clark a well known photographer and scientist had this very same question and he had to test it and his results are pretty remarkable. He calculated a person with perfect 20/20 vistion can see “Approximately” 575 million pixels ( equivalent ) of imagery if directly compared to a regular digital camera and how it would take, store, and process photographs. Ok so 575 million pixels that's an enormous amount of detail in a single image that would use up anywhere 350–700 Mb of data per image if a regular photograph camera was ever invented.That number of 575 megapixels is an average of Dr. Roger Clark's test as he got dozens of results ranging from 485MPX to well over 700MPX, 575 was the most common denominator of his results so he stuck with it and at a viewing distance of a subject at 20 feet which would be perfectly sharp with someone who has 20/20 “would" be this massive amount of detail.
Since human eyes are a biological optical sensor that works about as different as something could compared to a mechanical/ digital optical sensor and lense there is no definable resolution to which would be more image data than what our eyes can see but there are some estimates for sure.Dr. Roger Clark a well known photographer and scientist had this very same question and he had to test it and his results are pretty remarkable. He calculated a person with perfect 20/20 vistion can see “Approximately” 575 million pixels ( equivalent ) of imagery if directly compared to a regular digital camera and how it would take, store, and process photographs. Ok so 575 million pixels that's an enormous amount of detail in a single image that would use up anywhere 350–700 Mb of data per image if a regular photograph camera was ever invented.That number of 575 megapixels is an average of Dr. Roger Clark's test as he got dozens of results ranging from 485MPX to well over 700MPX, 575 was the most common denominator of his results so he stuck with it and at a viewing distance of a subject at 20 feet which would be perfectly sharp with someone who has 20/20 “would" be this massive amount of detail.The problem with the experiment is imagery captured from a camera is not totally comparable to human vision. When you look at something you have 120° Arc of vision which is naturally obtuse and 85% of that vision is peripheral so it's out of focus and might as well be VGA quality at that rate so it's meaningless until you focus on a spot which is only about 30° worth of your vision or basically dead center of you're binocular eyesight. When factoring all of this Dr. Roger Clark quickly found out 575MPX is vastly superior it total visable detail as that entire 4:3 image ( if taken normally ) would be in focus in every spot, so when reduced to human eye quality of traits, aspect ratio of 32:13 at 20 feet, and in focus in the middle 30° of the image you get an answer of again “approximately” 135 megapixels worth of image data.
hOpE it helps you
Answer:
Since human eyes are a biological optical sensor that works about as different as something could compared to a mechanical/ digital optical sensor and lense there is no definable resolution to which would be more image data than what our eyes can see but there are some estimates for sure.
Dr. Roger Clark a well known photographer and scientist had this very same question and he had to test it and his results are pretty remarkable. He calculated a person with perfect 20/20 vistion can see “Approximately” 575 million pixels ( equivalent ) of imagery if directly compared to a regular digital camera and how it would take, store, and process photographs. Ok so 575 million pixels that's an enormous amount of detail in a single image that would use up anywhere 350–700 Mb of data per image if a regular photograph camera was ever invented.
That number of 575 megapixels is an average of Dr. Roger Clark's test as he got dozens of results ranging from 485MPX to well over 700MPX, 575 was the most common denominator of his results so he stuck with it and at a viewing distance of a subject at 20 feet which would be perfectly sharp with someone who has 20/20 “would" be this massive amount of detail.
The problem with the experiment is imagery captured from a camera is not totally comparable to human vision. When you look at something you have 120° Arc of vision which is naturally obtuse and 85% of that vision is peripheral so it's out of focus and might as well be VGA quality at that rate so it's meaningless until you focus on a spot which is only about 30° worth of your vision or basically dead center of you're binocular eyesight. When factoring all of this Dr. Roger Clark quickly found out 575MPX is vastly superior it total visable detail as that entire 4:3 image ( if taken normally ) would be in focus in every spot, so when reduced to human eye quality of traits, aspect ratio of 32:13 at 20 feet, and in focus in the middle 30° of the image you get an answer of again “approximately” 135 megapixels worth of image data.
Explanation:
please mark as brainlist