History, asked by sanjanarane1987, 8 days ago

as soon as the swarajya began to expand, a crisis arose over the swarajya​

Answers

Answered by milimaheshwari7b25
14

Answer:

British raj, period of direct British rule over the Indian subcontinent from 1858 until the independence of India and Pakistan in 1947. The raj succeeded management of the subcontinent by the British East India Company, after general distrust and dissatisfaction with company leadership resulted in a widespread mutiny of sepoy troops in 1857, causing the British to reconsider the structure of governance in India. The British government took possession of the company’s assets and imposed direct rule. The raj was intended to increase Indian participation in governance, but the powerlessness of Indians to determine their own future without the consent of the British led to an increasingly adamant national independence movement.

Plz mark my answer as brainlists

Answered by dharanikamadasl
1

Answer:

As soon as the swarajya began to expand, a crisis arose over the swarajya​ - Self-government through the use of force is necessary since conflict only escalates when one person uses force against another. There is a peaceful alternative.

Explanation:

  • In 1909, everyone seemed to understand that the term "Swaraj" meant independence under British authority.
  • Gandhi, however, had a unique perspective on Swaraj.
  • His definition of self-rule included not only a rule by Indians but also—and maybe more significantlya rule by Indians that was based on Indian values and ethos.
  • Gandhi was not content with India's freedom coming from merely driving out the British.
  • This may be accomplished by rising up against them, like Americans did in 1776.
  • Although unsuccessfully, Indians attempted to duplicate this action in 1857.
  • It would not have been illegal for Indians to advocate for the use of force in order to protect their inherent right to liberty, equality, and fraternity. But Gandhi altered the situation.
  • That is to be prepared to go to jail, be beaten, and possibly be killed if you refuse to obey the unjust laws.
  • If a large portion of the populace disobeys the laws, no government can function. "We must offer ourselves as a sacrifice.
  • The idea that someone else should be killed is cowardly.
  • Despite being a nationalist, Dhingra's love was blind."
  • He used Ram Raj (Lord Ram's rule), in which people were sovereign and free from all misery, as the example of Swaraj before the Indian people.
  • They adhered to a set of moral principles that intertwined rights and obligations into a single, cohesive totality.
  • Even the king was subject to his duty.
  • His younger brother refused to become king because it was the privilege of the elder brother; he did not cross the river Ganga without paying the charges to the boatman; and he was so kind and generous that the tribal communities residing in the forest thought which he passed on his way to Lanka became his most ardent followers.
  • He compared them to his most devoted followers.
  • Rama spoke of obligations rather than rights.
  • Gandhi saw of rights and duties as two sides of the same coin; none could exist without the established order.
  • He prioritized duties because if no one executed them, there would be conflicts of interest, resentment among the populace, and poor communication between people and government authorities.

#SPJ2

Similar questions