Sociology, asked by rajputsushanthsing, 1 month ago

Assertion (A): A thing can be a use value, without having value. Reasoning (R): These are things which are not commodities.​

Answers

Answered by s1265prochat4606
0

Answer:   Both (A) and (R) are correct and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)

Explanation:  (A) A thing can be a use of value, without having value like- Happiness, joy, excitement, Enjoying the beautiful Aravali Hills, Studying books on the famous author Rabindranath Tagore, Meeting with Prime Minister, Lunch with your favourite celebrity, etc can have its moral values not like the money values which may not buy our happiness. like - Playing your favourite game will give you joy and excitement, on the other hand if you were asked by someone to do that task which you doesn't like then it will not have moral values.

(R) Those things which are not the commodity and have the values like- moral values

I hope you like this answer with correct explanation.

Thank you so much.

And one more thing.

Please mark me as Brainliest

Share this answer with your friends

And starts following me

I always feel Delightful when answering your problems

And Don't forget to give thanks for my kindness towards your question

Ask me about your problems

I will be available 24/7 hours.

Similar questions