Question

Assertion (A): The Constituent Assembly could not have been chosen directly by all the people of India.
Reason (R): There was no universal adult franchise at that time. So the Constituent Assembly could not have been chosen directly by all the people of India.
A. If Both assertion and reason are true and reason is the correct explanation of assertion.
B. If Both assertion and reason are true but reason is not the correct explanation of assertion.
C. If Assertion is true but reason is false.
D. If assertion is false and reason is true.​

Answer 1

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Pls mark me as brainliest

Answer 2

Assertion (A): The Constituent Assembly could not have been chosen directly by all the people of India. - True

• Members of the Constituent Assembly were elected as well as appointed.
• The members were additionally indirectly elected by the provincial assembly members, who were similarly chosen by a restricted vote.

Reason (R): There was no universal adult franchise at that time. So the Constituent Assembly could not have been chosen directly by all the people of India. - True.

• The Constituent Assembly was not directly elected by the Indian people using the adult franchise, but rather through proportional representation with a single transferable vote.
• In essence, it captured every facet of Indian culture.
• The Congress Party, the Muslim League, and other independent and minor parties made comprised its multiparty assembly.
• It created several Committees to carry out various Constitution-making tasks.

Both the claim and the justification are accurate, but the justification offered is not the proper justification for the claim made.

#SPJ3