Social Sciences, asked by fahimsiddika, 5 hours ago

Assertion (A): The Estates General was a political body and was controlled by the French Monarch. Reason (R): The Estates General had power to make law.
A. If Both assertion and reason are true and reason is the correct explanation of assertion.
B. If Both assertion and reason are true but reason is not the correct explanation of assertion.
C. If Assertion is true but reason is false.
D. If assertion is false and reason is true.

Answers

Answered by anshuman916sl
0

Correct Answer:

C. If Assertion is true but reason is false.

Explanation:

  • In France under the Ancien Régime, the Estates General or States-General was a legislative and consultative assembly of the different classes of French subjects.
  • It had a separate assembly for each of the three estates, which were called and dismissed by the king.
  • It had no true power in its own right as, unlike the English parliament, it was not required to approve royal taxation or legislation.
  • It served as an advisory body to the king, primarily by presenting petitions from the various estates and consulting on fiscal policy.
  • The effective powers of the Estates General likewise varied over time. In the 14th century they were considerable.
  • The king could not, in theory, levy general taxation.
  • Even in the provinces attached to the domain of the Crown, he could levy it only where he had retained the haute justice over the inhabitants, but not on the subjects of lords having the haute justice.
  • The privileged towns generally had the right of taxing themselves.
  • To collect general taxes, the king required consent of the lay and ecclesiastical lords, and of the towns.
  • This amounted to needing authorization from the Estates General, which granted these subsidies only temporarily and for fairly short periods.
  • As a result, they were summoned frequently and their power over the Crown became considerable.

#SPJ3

Answered by krithikasmart11
0

Answer:

Correct Option: C Assertion is true but reason is false.

Explanation:

Assertion is true but reason is false.

  • In France below the Ancien Régime, the Estates General or States-General turned into a legislative and consultative meeting of the unique lessons of French subjects.

  • It had a separate meeting for every of the 3 estates, which have been referred to as and disregarded via way of means of the king.

  • It had no genuine electricity in its personal proper as, not like the English parliament, it turned into now no longer required to approve royal taxation or legislation.

  • It served as an advisory frame to the king, in most cases via way of means of offering petitions from the diverse estates and consulting on monetary policy.

  • The powerful powers of the Estates General likewise numerous over time. In the 14th century they have been considerable.

  • The king may want to now no longer, in theory, levy fashionable taxation. Even withinside the provinces connected to the area of the Crown, he may want to levy it most effective in which he had retained the haute justice over theinhabitants, however now no longer at the subjects of lords having the haute justice. The privileged cities normally had the proper of taxing themselves.

  • To accumulate fashionable taxes, the king required consent of the lay and ecclesiastical lords, and of the cities.

  • This amounted to wanting authorization from the Estates General, which granted those subsidies most effective quickly and for pretty quick periods.

  • As a result, they have been summoned regularly and their electricity over the Crown have become considerable.
  • #SPJ3

Similar questions