Question

Assertion: In Britain, the formation of a nation-state was not the result of a sudden upheaval.
Reason: Ethnic groups of Britain extended their influence.

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true and the reason is the correct explanation of the assertion.
b) Both Assertion and Reason are true but the reason is not the correct explanation of the assertion.
c) Assertion is true, reason is false.
d) Assertion is false, reason is true.

Answer 1

Answer:

Option b is the correct option

Answer 2

Answer:

Option(c) is correct. Assertion is true, reason is false.

Explanation:

As the English nation progressively increased in power, money, and importance, it was able to exert more influence over the other island states.

Thus, the English nation rather than the ethnic groupings expanded their power. In Britain, the establishment of the nation-state was not the consequence of a dramatic upheaval or revolution.

It was the end consequence of a protracted procedure. The English nation expanded its influence over the other island nations as a result of its steady rise in terms of wealth, prominence, and power.

The United Kingdom of Great Britain was established after the Act of Union, which was passed in 1707. Therefore, it is clear that the only distinction in the process of nation-state development between a quick reaction and a long-term reaction was procedure.

It was the result of a long-drawn-out process. Steady growth of the English nation steadily in case of wealth, importance and power, it was able to extend its influence over the other nations of the islands.

Learn more about it:

https://brainly.in/question/47609555

https://brainly.in/question/47615162

#SPJ2