Social Sciences, asked by nishvan0909, 11 days ago

assertion: majority community is dominant in a few democratic countries
reason: dominance can undermine the unity of the country
pls answer to this ques

Answers

Answered by Anonymous
0

Both the Assertion and Reason are true.

  • The fact that Sri Lanka and Belgium are both democratic countries demonstrates this. They did, however, tackle the social issue of ability distribution in a variety of ways.
  • Belgium's authorities realised that considering the opinions and interests of diverse communities and areas is the best approach to promote national unity.
  • As the case of Sri Lanka demonstrates, such understanding led to mutual agreement power-sharing accords.
  • It vividly illustrates how a majority community's real desire to impose its dominance over others, as well as its seeming refusal to share authority, can jeopardise the social cohesion of an independent country.
Answered by Tulsi4890
0

(a) Both Assertion (A) and Renson (R) are true and Reason (R) is the correct explanation of Assertion (A)

  • There are many democratic countries in the world that have the dominance of the majority community.
  • Example: Indonesia is a democratic country but is dominated by the majority religion.
  • In a democracy, the minority and majority should rule together in harmony.
  • The dominance of a particular community can develop a feeling of discrimination among minorities. This may affect the unity of the country.
Similar questions