Social Sciences, asked by deepika4038, 1 day ago

Assertion - the sepoys in the colonial Army were unhappy with many rules and regulations imposed by the British.



Reasoning - The leadership of the 1857 revolt was weak and unorganised

pls answer my question write I will mark you as brainlist otherwise I will report your answer​

Answers

Answered by ramanshreya26
1

Answer:

a is true but r is false

Explanation:

In 1857, uprisings and rebellions ended the British East India Company's (EIC) control in India, then it became an official British colony. Historians continue to debate the nature of these uprisings.

In 1783, Great Britain, stinging from the American Revolution and loss of 13 promising colonies, took a closer look at the Indian subcontinent. The British East India Company (EIC) intensified its efforts to collect taxes and dominate territories in this vast, populous region. Sometimes simply called "the Company" the EIC was indeed a business that did international trade. But it also conquered and ruled over an increasing number of Mughal territories and independent princely states, so its "business" was pretty much imperialism. Under a policy called the Doctrine of Lapse, the EIC took control over more than 25 states in India in the 1800s. This policy meant that if the British deemed the rulers of those states "incompetent," or if they lacked a proper heir, the EIC could just take over the territory and rule it directly themselves. Any resistance to EIC control was met with a military response. That included British troops as well as thousands of locally recruited Indian troops called sepoys. Let's look at the expansion of British control on the Indian subcontinent and the differing perspectives of the 1857 uprising by Indians against "the Company."

If you were a young man in India needing an honest job that paid well, joining the Company army as a sepoy would have been appealing. However, once employed you would soon be faced with racial discrimination and your religious beliefs would be challenged by EIC policies. Whether Muslim or Hindu, you and your fellow sepoys would be expected to adapt your religions and culture to the needs of the army. Also, you could forget about ever being promoted to higher ranks in the army, because only your British co-workers would get those jobs. Sepoys helped expand the domination of the East India Company across South Asia and were shipped abroad to expand the British Empire overseas. By the 1800s, the Mughal Empire was a much smaller and weaker state, whose authority was recognized only by some princes and local governors. Most stopped supporting the Mughal army and paying taxes. The central authority of the Mughals was so weak they could offer little resistance to the East India Company and its increasingly massive sepoy army.

By the mid-1800s, many Indians, including a number of sepoys, were frustrated with living under EIC control. Excessive taxation, mismanagem

Similar questions