Biology, asked by sutenusen7067, 1 year ago

Assertion we should not consider wood as renewable resources
Reason it take long time to get

Answers

Answered by Anonymous

Question - Assertion (A) : We should not consider “wood “ as a renewable source of energy . 1

Reason (R) : Once it is used up it takes a very long time to become available again.

a) Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A .

b) Both A and R are true and R is not the correct explanation of A .

c) A is true but R is false .

d) A is false but R is true

Answer - Correct option is d) A is false but R is true

•Wood is considered a renewable energy resource.

•Renewable energy resource refers to the material which can grow back in our life time.

•Since wood can easily be obtained within our lifetime by planting trees, it is a renewable energy resource.

•Wood takes long time to grow as it takes long time for a sapling to develop into trees which can provide wood. Though trees can grow within lifetime of a human.

Answered by smartbrainz

The assertion and reasoning are both true.

Explanation:

Woods are not renewable resources because it takes long time for growth of plants.Renewable resources cannot be replenished naturally. The statement is false.

The natural resources are derived from the environment. The natural resources may be divided into non-renewable resources. They exist over the long area covering the huge area. They are meant long-time usage. They include certain air, water, solar energy minerals.

The rate of formation extremely slow, they "cannot be replenished" once they get depleted. This source can be used for existence. Hence the "air, water, and solar energy can be replenished naturally".