Attempt to formulate your moral values on the practice of science. Imagine yourself stumbling upon a discovery which has great academic interest but is certain to have nothing but dangerous consequences for the human society. How, if at all, will you resolve your dilemma?
Answers
Answered by
1
A researcher goes for truth. A logical disclosure uncovers a fact of nature. Accordingly, any revelation great or awful for human culture must be made open, albeit moral and moral qualities may have a contention with the act of science. A disclosure which seems perilous today may wind up helpful to humanity now and again later. We should develop a solid general feeling so as to keep the abuse of logical innovation. Along these lines researchers in truth should take up two jobs :
To find truth and make it open to keep its abuse, e.g. cloning of creatures like sheep Dolly is connected to humanity then it will be against moral qualities as it will require no man – lady for entertainment. Be that as it may, as a logical truth it is made open. On the off chance that I unearth such an incredible concept as a researcher, I will minimum trouble good and keep on reality to wind up open .
To find truth and make it open to keep its abuse, e.g. cloning of creatures like sheep Dolly is connected to humanity then it will be against moral qualities as it will require no man – lady for entertainment. Be that as it may, as a logical truth it is made open. On the off chance that I unearth such an incredible concept as a researcher, I will minimum trouble good and keep on reality to wind up open .
Similar questions