History, asked by rm816089123, 3 months ago

Aurangzeb's policies that led to his own downfall(140 words)

Answers

Answered by shinchan0416
1

Answer:

Aurangzeb's religious policy was largely responsible for the downfall of the Mughal Empire. His policy of religious persecution of the Hindus, who formed the bulk of the population of the country, hastened the fall of his dynasty. Akbar won over the Hindus by a policy of religious toleration.Costly, long drawn and ruinous Deccan campaigns. ... He lost the support from the Rajputs who had earlier contributed greatly to the stability of the Mughal Empire; the Rajputs later became bitter foes of the Mughal Empire.

HOPE IT HELPS

PLEASE MARK IT THE BRAINLIEST ANSWER

Answered by parveshkumar270762
1

Answer:

He was a notable expansionist; during his reign, the Mughal Empire reached its greatest extent, ruling over nearly all of the Indian subcontinent.[13] During his lifetime, victories in the south expanded the Mughal Empire to 4 million square kilometres,[14] and he ruled over a population estimated to be over 158 million subjects,[13] Under his reign, India surpassed Qing China to become the world's largest economy and biggest manufacturing power, worth nearly a quarter of global GDP and more than the entirety of Western Europe, and its largest and wealthiest subdivision, the Bengal Subah,[15] signaled the proto-industrialization.[16][17][18][page needed]

Aurangzeb was noted for his religious piety; he memorized the entire Quran, studied hadiths and stringently observed the rituals of Islam.[19][20] Unlike his predecessors, including his father Shah Jahan, Aurangzeb considered the royal treasury to be held in trust for the citizens of his empire.[20][page needed][21][page needed] He did not enjoy a luxurious life and his personal expenses and constructions of small mosques were covered by his own earnings, which included the sewing of caps and trade of his written copies of the Quran.[22][23] He also patronized works of Islamic and Arabic calligraphy.[24]

Aurangzeb has been subject to criticism. Critics argue that his policies abandoned his predecessors' legacy of pluralism and religious tolerance, citing his introduction of the jizya tax and other policies based on Islamic ethics, demolition of Hindu temples, the executions of his elder brother Dara Shikoh, Maratha king Sambhaji[25][26] and the Sikh Guru Tegh Bahadur,[27][28][a] and the prohibition and supervision of behaviour and activities that are forbidden in Islam such as gambling, fornication, and consumption of alcohol and narcotics.[29][30] Some historians question the historicity of the claims of his critics, arguing that his destruction of temples has been exaggerated,[31][32] and noting that he also built temples,[33] paid for their maintenance, employed significantly more Hindus in his imperial bureaucracy than his predecessors did, and opposed bigotry against Hindus and Shia Muslims.[34]

Explanation:

hope it helps!

Similar questions