b) A historian wants to study about early vedic age. She finds a microliths from around 9,000 yrs ago and a manuscript from around 3,500 yrs ago. Which of these sources should she use to study the early vedic age and why?
Plz.. I need a proper answer
Answers
Answered by
1
Answer:
she should study about manuscript from around 3,500 years ago... 3500 BC: Pictographic proto-writing starts developing towards writing proper in Sumer, thus starting what is technically considered history.
hope it helped you :>
Similar questions