History, asked by judahemmanuel066, 6 months ago

b) A historian wants to study about early vedic age. She finds a microliths from around 9,000 yrs ago and a manuscript from around 3,500 yrs ago. Which of these sources should she use to study the early vedic age and why?

Plz.. I need a proper answer​

Answers

Answered by akshayadhanisetty
1

Answer:

she should study about manuscript from around 3,500 years ago... 3500 BC: Pictographic proto-writing starts developing towards writing proper in Sumer, thus starting what is technically considered history.

hope it helped you :>

Similar questions