(Bacteria is a eukaryotic Organisms) dies this statement is correct or not
Answers
Answer:
There are two kinds of organisms, eukaryotes, which have a nucleus, and bacteria. There are two kinds of bacteria, archaebacteria and eubacteria. Bacteria have also been named as “prokaryotes”, but that is not a good name, because it indicates that they existed before the eukaryotes. A more neutral name has also been used: akaryotes. But also red blood cells are akaryotes. It is in my opinion much better to just call them bacteria. The naming originates from a time when it was generally assumed that bacteria are the original. It has no become more and more clear that they are not. Eukaryotes have a lot of remains from the RNA world, and also the phylogenies that Carl Woese presented are not in coordance with bacteria being the original. Woese did not either like the name prokaryote, because he saw the origin as a state where there was no clear distinction between eukaryotes and bacteria. But he actually created a need for the naming that he disliked, when he divided the group of bacteria in two: archaebacteria and eubacteria. For short, he named them Archaea and Bacteria. I have in the Eukaryote Extension Theory and in the Organelle Escape Theory, which together present a new and better explanation for the origin of eukaryotes and bacteria, used the old and not naming, bacteria without a nucleus and eukaryotes with a nucleus. So to answer your quesition: Bacterial cells are akaryotic, i.e. have no nucleus, but the confusing naming “prokaryote” still exists, so you can of cause use it, just remember that they did not occur before the nucleus occurred, as the name indicates. But bacteria are absolutely not eukaryotes. Eukaryotes have a nucleus, lots of organelles and are much more complex and much larger. Examples of eukaryotes are yeast, amoeba, flowers, trees and humans.
no it is not eukaryotic it's prokaryotic organism