Question

behind?
b. Why does the author say, "Toto was not the sort of pet we could keep for
long”?
In what way is Iswaran an asset to Mahendra?​

Answer 1

Answer:

The author said that Toto was not the sort of pet they could keep for long because he was very mischievous and kept destroying things at home. He would tear things to pieces. He would make every effort to tear a hole in the narrator's aunt's dresses.

Answer 2

Answer:

$\huge\rm\red{AnSwEr:-}$

Author’s statement about Toto proves itself if we take Toto’s misdeeds into consideration. Nobody could afford the frequent losses. He disturbed all other animals too. Obviously Toto was not the sort of pet we could keep for long.