best thoughts on gender bias myths or reality
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Girls like pink, boys like blue!
Girls grow up with dolls, boys grow up with toy cars!
Aren’t these some inherent gender bias existing in the minds of people?
We claim that all humans are equal, irrespective of their sexual orientation but still the standardized social and patriarchal gender role gravitates a person to behave in a certain manner which makes them bias and restricts the holistic growth of a person. Gender bias is expounded as distinguishing individuals based on their sexual orientation and treating them unequally. It is the propensity to favor one gender over the other for no valid reason. The sexist stereotype considers women as docile, emotional, caring, and less aggressive whereas men are considered totally opposite. For a long time, women have consistently tried to obtain fairness, regard, indistinguishable rights from men and fought against patriarchy. If these gender disparities are abbreviated, it will lead to their enormous advancement of people striving for gender equality and yield humongous benefits such as increased productivity, wider social cohesion and escalated poverty reduction.
In modern times, women have become significant at workplaces. They have entered different arenas and have outshined men but still, sometimes they are held back by the structure at the workplace that underrepresents women and it hampers the advancement of women and limits them to achieve leadership positions. Treatment of two equal people differently based on their gender in various aspects like the job per se, training and development, remuneration, recognition, equal opportunities etc. is considered as the prevalence of bias at the workplace.
Occupational Dynamics
Women have now shifted from household work to commercial employment which uplifts their interest and their existence in the world and it does not imply that their participation in household work has reduced but it continues to be the same. But still, they have to face inequitable treatment at their workplace which can be called occupational inequality.
As the dual labor market theory emphasized that the male cluster is concentrated in the primary sector and the female cluster in the secondary sector. And further, the theory contextualizes the primary sector as more capital investment market, fraternization, advanced technology, more opportunities for career advancement, comparatively higher earnings and low employee turnover, whereas, secondary sector is the one with comparatively lesser earnings and benefits and lesser opportunities for career advancement with high turnover. Consequently, when people at the organization have a “taste of discrimination”, it develops prejudices and favoritism due to which the other forces find it difficult to mitigate that bias against females or minorities.
For example, first, due to lack of job opportunities, women are encouraged to take up entrepreneurship where they face different kinds of hindrances such as lack of access to institutional finances which impedes them from the growth and advancement of their business
Second, women in scientific professions face different challenges. They have stated that due to family obligations they fail to convert their degrees into careers and that is why women only make up 14% among 2.8 lacs scientists in India.
Third, even in the military, women in armed forces were not allowed in arms of close combat, fighting roles and command positions. But now in the historic judgment of The Secretary, Ministry of Defence v. Babita Puniya & Ors. the Supreme Court held that women shall be eligible to get command posts equal to that of the male officers. This shows that times are changing and steps are taken to uplift women, but the inequality still prevails because of the highest gender diversity in the air force where men are 7 times more than women and, in the army, men are 27 times more than women.
Critical Analysis of Judicial Framework on Gender Equality at Workplace
The landmark case of Vishaka & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors addresses the issue of gender equality at the workplace. The case is based on whether sexual harassment violates the fundamental right of women based on gender equality which is codified under Article 14 of the Constitution of India and also the fundamental right to life and to live a dignified life under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.