big bang theory claim and objections
Answers
Answer:(1) Quasars with very large red shifts seem to be attached to (or interacting with) galaxies with much smaller redshifts.
(2) Light Element Abundances predict contradictory densities The Big bang theory predicts the density of ordinary matter in the universe from the abundance of a few light elements. The chance that the theory is right is now less than one in one hundred trillion.
(3) Large-scale Voids are too old The Big bang theory predicts that no object in the universe can be older than the Big Bang. Yet the large-scale voids observed in the distortion of galaxies cannot have been formed in the time since the Big Bang, without resulting in velocities of present-day galaxies far in excess of those observed.
(4) Surface brightness is constant In contrast, the Big Bang expanding universe predicts that surface brightness, defined as above, decreases as (z+1)-3. More distant objects actually should appear bigger. But observations show that in fact the surface brightness of galaxies up to a redshift of 6 are exactly constant, as predicted by a non-expanding universe and in sharp contradiction to the Big Bang.
(5) Efforts to explain this difference by evolution--early galaxies are different than those today-- lead to predictions of galaxies that are impossibly bright and dense.”
(6) No room for dark matter While the Big bang theory requires that there is far more dark matter than ordinary matter, discoveries of white dwarfs(dead stars) in the halo of our galaxy and of warm plasma clouds in the local group of galaxies show that there is enough ordinary matter to account for the gravitational effects observed, so there is no room for extra dark matter.
Explanation: