boon or bane of bieng selfish
Answers
Answer:
I can't understand what u are asking about
Being selfish is bane:
Selfishness, Our old sages have called this quality bad, but in our understanding, they say it is unproven, because what is the evidence of the words of someone who does not know? Stayed in the forest, ate vegans, wore white clothes, etc. Never did any business, nor did anyone's job, nor had to work from any foreign country, then what did they know about the enjoyment of selfishness? If Maharaja Bhartrihari has even written ‘Tami Manusha Rakshasa: Parhitam Swarthy’ among the new sages, then we will say that he has only added yes to the old people, or has deliberately deceived, otherwise selfishness is bad. Is not an object Everyone has always been consuming the same.
The Brahmins were irresponsible to do whatever was the rule of Hindus, because they used to be the ministers and poets, it made them all independent. What if it was selfishness? Even in Muslim Amaldari, there was justice in King Karai. The king's oppression was also deemed to be an justice, there was a self-denying. Nowadays there is no such thing in English state which is empty of selfishness, otherwise it should tell about two things which have been done for the benefit of the subjects only. Describe some work in which a small benefit of the English caste was also taken for the great loss of Hindustan.
No matter what you think in the end, no one will say it. Then what we say is bad that 'no one is evil in selfishness, everyone has always done it.' If the Mahidevas (Brahmins) and the masters (emperors) of the humble world consider our Gaurang lords as humans, then read the character of the gods in the Ramayana. Ramachandra Lakshmana turned Sita around for fourteen years, kept Bharati in Ajodhya and fasted it, took Dasaratha's life. Why? By request of selfishness Goswamiji has openly said, 'Aye dev sada swarthy'. When this is the condition of the gods, then how can a human being separate from selfishness.
To tell the truth, those who condemn selfishness, they selfishly make others to be deviant. If others do not get entangled in the confusion of mercy, religion, justice, selflessness etc. then how to set your spot on occasion. In this we have been convinced that selfishness is never in any condition for clever intelligent policy men. Those who teach selfishness to others, they lure people to do their job well, but those who get stuck in their words and become industry to be a believer, they break the law of nature, without giving up their happiness, wealth, good fortune Let's face Otherwise, who among the elders is selfless? Do gods want demons? Do Mahatma People Celebrate Atheists? Should God be pleased with the gods? Then where is the problem?
All are selfish. Yes, your family, your caste, your country should also give some training to the others who have fame. It is foolish to abstain from having such a fun thing as a bad thing. Those who are big-time recruits, devout devotees, they never give up selfishness. He wants the true nature of Sachchidananda to leave the pleasures of the world. Hence, there are very big selfish seekers. Then where is the bullock, by living in the world, living in the world, dying selflessly or selfishly. There is no condition of the world if it is not selfish. By doing great diligence, the best things that people should accumulate, hand over to the other, hand over to the third one, in the same way, nothing can happen to anyone in a few days. That is to say, "Self-proclaimed master.
" Yes, very little selfishness is bad, the behaviour of "you live junta jag ji karma mare na harm" is condemned. It should increase self-interest more and more. Do not be selfish for yourself, you should only self-interest. No matter how much damage is done to the selfishness of our country, what duty should be incurred. Because without it there is no subsistence. Regardless of whether you go to Baikuntha, but always remain unhappy in the world, and those who obey our great mantra, do double quadruple nights. India and England are direct proofs of this.
However, do not know when our native brothers will know the glory of selfishness. We say affirmatively, whoever does not consider condemnation for selfish means, sin renunciation, will be complete in a few days and in the end no one will have the courage to condemn it. Mahatma has said ‘Samarth ko nahin dos gusaini'.
Being dishonest in self-esteem, a dishonest man is called a clever, a murderer is called a hero, a blasphemy is an articulate. The one who has the kindness of the Mahatma would have the same self-interest. With this, brothers, recite the sentence of the Brahmin by reciting the Vedas, in the night, awake, asleep, self-interested. It will be good in this or not, there will always be a downfall like it has been since the time of Mahabharata.