Social Sciences, asked by avaneeshsinghhada, 9 months ago

Brief about to SAFE GUARD PUBLIC property and to abjure violence​

Answers

Answered by Anonymous
0

Answer:

Explanation:

arge number of citizens are on the streets protesting the newly amended Citizenship Act. Their right to protect emerges from Article 19 (1)(a) of the Constitution. It gives all citizens the right "to assemble peacefully and without arms".

Citizens hitting the streets of cities across states against the Citizenship Amendment Act are exercising their fundamental right guaranteed under the Constitution.

But the visuals beamed on the television show that many of them are using arms - stones, bricks, lathis and some inflammable materials too - and have damaged public property, even resorting to setting public and private vehicles on fire.

These violent protests have taken place at places where restrictions were imposed under Section 144 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC).

Resorting to violence during protest is violation of a key fundamental duty of citizens. Enumerated in Article 51A, the Constitution makes it a fundamental duty of every citizen "to safeguard public property and to abjure violence".

LAW SAYS ONE THING, PROTESTERS OTHER

Then there is the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 which makes damage to public property by an individual punishable with jail term of six months extendable up to five years and a fine or both.

Public property under the law includes "any means of public transportation or of tele-communications" and any building or installation of public use or service.

Answered by thakurdeepa183
1

Answer:

(i) to safeguard public property and to abjure violence; (j) to strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievments

plss mark as brainliest

Similar questions