Briefly explain the State the results of competition among workers
Answers
Answered by
0
In economics, "competition" is the rivalry among sellers trying to achieve such goals as increasing profits, market share, and sales volume by varying the elements of the marketing mix: price, product, promotion and place. Merriam-Webster defines competition in business as "the effort of two or more parties acting independently to secure the business of a third party by offering the most favorable terms".[1] In his 1776 The Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith described it as the exercise of allocating productive resources to their most highly valued uses and encouraging efficiency, an explanation that quickly found support among liberal economists opposing the monopolistic practices of mercantilism, the dominant economic philosophy of the time.[2][3] Smith and other classical economists before Cournot were referring to price and non-price rivalry among producers to sell their goods on best terms by bidding of buyers, not necessarily to a large number of sellers nor to a market in final equilibrium.[4]
Later microeconomic theory distinguished between perfect competition and imperfect competition, concluding that perfect competition is Pareto efficient while imperfect competition is not.[citation needed] Competition, according to the theory, causes commercial firms to develop new products, services and technologies, which would give consumers greater selection and better products. The greater selection typically causes lower prices for the products, compared to what the price would be if there was no competition (monopoly) or little competition (oligopoly).
Competition is generally accepted as a necessary condition for the coordination of disparate individuals interests via the market process.[5]
That's why the results of competition among the workers lead to perfection in their work.They start doing very perfectly in order to become 1st from others
Hope helped
Later microeconomic theory distinguished between perfect competition and imperfect competition, concluding that perfect competition is Pareto efficient while imperfect competition is not.[citation needed] Competition, according to the theory, causes commercial firms to develop new products, services and technologies, which would give consumers greater selection and better products. The greater selection typically causes lower prices for the products, compared to what the price would be if there was no competition (monopoly) or little competition (oligopoly).
Competition is generally accepted as a necessary condition for the coordination of disparate individuals interests via the market process.[5]
That's why the results of competition among the workers lead to perfection in their work.They start doing very perfectly in order to become 1st from others
Hope helped
Answered by
0
Answer:
Attachments:
Similar questions
Math,
7 months ago
English,
7 months ago
English,
7 months ago
Math,
1 year ago
Social Sciences,
1 year ago
Computer Science,
1 year ago