Question

Briefly explain why it is necessary to critique a scientific argument before it is accepted.

Answer 1

It is necessary to critique a scientific argument before it is accepted due to the following reasons:

Explanation:

• Every scientific discovery needs to be thoroughly investigated before it is approved.

• The experiments conducted to prove the theory should be valid and approved for the theory.

• The scientific discovery is also subjected to critique so that different opinions of scientist can be considered and still be checked that whether the discovery or theory c=still can stand.

• The critique observations are considered so that every aspect of the scientific discovery can be judged before approving it.

Answer 2

Answer:

It is necessary to critique a scientific argument before it is accepted due to the following reasons:

Explanation:

Every scientific discovery needs to be thoroughly investigated before it is approved.

The experiments conducted to prove the theory should be valid and approved for the theory.

The scientific discovery is also subjected to critique so that different opinions of scientist can be considered and still be checked that whether the discovery or theory c=still can stand.

The critique observations are considered so that every aspect of the scientific discovery can be judged before approving it.