Social Sciences, asked by sicilvivish, 2 months ago

British began setting up infrastructure. They build roads, and railroads to carry goods and people all around India. They also brought with them modern farming techniques which made Indian farmers more efficient and productive. These were undoubtedly positive developments for India under British rule. Then why our Indian farmers, weavers, rulers etc. were not happy under the British rule? Explain
Who ever answers first gets brainliest
Remember pls write in shot !

Answers

Answered by diya32275
1

Answer:

Infrastructure in India

The state of infrastructure during the India was very poor. The transportation and communication lines were below average. In fact, most of the villages lacked connectivity by a roads. Consequently, natural dusty tracks were the roads predominant in India. However, such roads spelt misery during monsoons as they became muddy and difficult to traverse.

Additionally, during natural calamities, these roads became as a result of which various areas became inaccessible and were carriages were the most common mode of transport. This meant it would generally take a lot of days to travel to other places. Hence the movement of passengers and freights was very inefficient and slow.

Water transport was not very popular except in some parts of North India where rivers were navigable. In a nutshell, the l state of infrastructure in India was far below satisfactory and the Britishers were responsible for most of our infrastructure

Search for a topic

Economics

Indian Economy on the Eve of Independence

Infrastructure

If we start noting the pros and of British rule over India, the negatives column would definitely outgrow the positives. However, the infrastructure development, especially the railways, will certainly be one positive if not all. Ironically, as was with all colonial moves, the idea of railways again gained momentum to strengthen the British monopoly which was already on a high. Evidently, between 1860 and 1940, total railways route miles increased from 838 to 41,852.

Suggested Videos

ArrowArrow

ArrowArrow

Introduction to Economics

Nature of Economics

Utility of Economics to Society

Solve

Questions

Why is there heavy competition for work among farm labourers in Palampur?

1 Verified answer

State Financial Corporations gives assistance mainly to develop which of the following?

1 Verified answer

Reservation for the position of women in all Panchayat Raj institutions is ______.

1 Verified answer

VIEW MORE

Infrastructure in Pre-colonial India

The state of infrastructure during the pre-British India was very poor. The transportation and communication lines were below average. In fact, most of the villages lacked connectivity by pucca roads. Consequently, natural dusty tracks were the roads predominant in India. However, such roads spelt misery during monsoons as they became muddy and difficult to traverse.

Additionally, during natural calamities, these roads became unfunctional as a result of which various areas became inaccessible and were cut-off. Animal-drawn carriages were the most common mode of transport. This meant it would generally take a lot of days to travel to other places. Hence the movement of passengers and freights was very inefficient and slow.

Water transport was not very popular except in some parts of North India where rivers were navigable. In a nutshell, thestate of infrastructure in India was far below satisfactory and the Britishers were responsible for most of our infrastructure development.

Image result for Infrastructurein 19th century

Infrastructure Development in British India

In their long history of two centuries of exploitation, Britishers did everything to drain Indian wealth and support their home country. The poor state of infrastructure was a major hurdle to this process.

Transportation of materials from the countryside to ports was inefficient and time-consuming. In fact, various routes became inaccessible due to an absence of permanent roads. Development of infrastructure was thus a necessity to empower colonial motives. Hence, the development of telegraphs, roads, railways, ports, ports and water transport was aimed at British empowerment rather than providing basic amenities to people.

Answered by idiot2006
2

Answer:

Not considering the positive impacts , the British were exploiting us more than they were actually being beneficial to us . First they targeted the rulers as they were the first obstacle , along with other European powers , coming in the way . When they became the rulers , they started using the potential of our land to benefit their homeland . Their tax slabs were on the peak everywhere ( even higher than today's government puts ) . The other thing was that our country was rich in resources . The British bought these raw materials at low prices and when they turned them into finished products , they sold them everywhere at high prices . In fact they forced us to become a major importer from a major exporter

Similar questions