c) A historian wants to study about the early Vedic age She finds a microlith from
around 9.000 years ago and a manuscript from around 3 500 years ago Which of
these sources should she use to study the early Vedic age and why?
Answers
Answered by
0
Answer:
she should study about manuscript from around 3,500 years ago... 3500 BC: Pictographic proto-writing starts developing towards writing proper in Sumer, thus starting what is technically considered history.
Similar questions