c) A historian wants to study about the early Vedic age. She finds a microlith from
around 9,000 years ago and a manuscript from around 3,500 years ago. Which of
these sources should she use to study the early Vedic age and why?
Answers
Answered by
1
Explanation:
Answer. Answer: she should study about manuscript from around 3,500 years ago... 3500 BC: Pictographic proto-writing starts developing towards writing proper in Sumer, thus starting what is technically considered history.
Answered by
0
she must study about manuscript from around 3,500 years ago.... Pictographic which is considered as proto-writing starts developing towards writing proper in Sumer....
Similar questions