Social Sciences, asked by aarzoo93, 4 months ago

c) Rohan believes that there is no need for a government. Without a government,
people would not be bound by laws and be free. Do you agree with Rohan? Give
three reasons to support your answer.
Pls Answer this question I mark brainlest​

Answers

Answered by darshlakshmikanth
13

Answer:

HEY MATE, ITS NOT A PROBLEM IF YOU DON'T MARK ME THE BRAINIEST. HERE IS A SHORT DISCRIPTION ON YOUR QUESTION.

SO A PLACE WITHOUT A GOVT. MIGHT LOOK AWESOME AS YOU DON'T HAVE TO FOLLOW ANY RULES, BUT IN ROAD BECAUSE THERE IS NO GOVT. THERE MIGHT BE MANY ACCIDENTS, ROBBERIES, MURDER, PICKPOCKETS, POOR CITY/COUNTRY AND STARTING OF A DICTATOR GOVT.

HOPE YOU FOUND THIS HELPFULL

Answered by sshrushti2004
59

Answer:

I am not agree with Rohan.

Explanation:

because

1) government are necessary because they maintain low and order.

2)if there is no government ,then there will lack of rules and regulations.

3)lows are necessary for society to function.life in the society without lows would be unsafe and un predictable.

Hope it helpful to you

Similar questions