CAA-NRC define wether it is harmfull or helpfull? 200 words minimum! your work is appreciated.
Answers
Answer:In my point of view CAA is very neccessary for thise who were left behind in partision.
Step-by-step explanation:
CAA says that it will provide Indian Citizenship to those who are facing persecution in Pakistan;Afghanistan;Bangladesh i.e Hindu Sikh Jain Christain Parsi etc
WHY MUSLIMS AREN'T INCLUDED?
- The reason behind it is that All those three countries are DECLARED ISLAMIC STATE so Its not possible that Muslim face persecution in these countries.
Then we come to the riots- The Riots are happening only due to people like- Sharjeel Imam Kapil Mishra Pravesh Verma Swara bhaskar Rubbish Kumar etc
So in my views its NECCESARY
Answer:
hey mate
if I really say so it is impossible to take one side
so......
from my point of view the decision making of NRC and CAA was right my points are given below.....
some impacts which are good by NRC is ...
As proposed, if a nationwide NRC comes in place, the affected will be detained and taken to large detention centres, as it is happening in Assam. After that, the Ministry of External Affairs will get in touch with the concerned nations. If the details of the detained are matched and accepted by the concerned nations, deportations will follow. The politics of NRC BJP chief Shah has been raising the pitch for a nationwide NRC for some time now
but in my views of CAA ( AS SUPPORT......)
the act is not only about people facing persecution, why are migrants from other countries -- such as Hindus from Sri Lanka -- not eligible to apply for citizenship under this act? Or Muslim (Rohingya) migrants from Myanmar?
The government says this is a time-bound provision to provide relief to immigrants who have suffered in Islamic countries because India got divided on religious lines. India has, from time to time, provided citizenship to immigrants of all religions from different