Can anyone fully explain me the summary of the poem Fire and Ice written by Robert Frost? Please explain in simple words.
Answers
Hey mate!!
here's your answer...
»The chapter Fire and Ice,written by Robert Frost.
it's a very simple and meaningful poem.
{It's explanation...}
»The poet wonders wether the world destroyed /end in fire or ice.Both things stands in contract and are opposite of each other.These are symbolizing passion and desire,hatred(or hate) and indifference in human relationship.
(In first para..)
There are people who says that fire,heat and passion will end the world.There are also people who says that the ice or hate will end the world.
The poet tells that he personally believe or have opinion that world is destroyed by fire.
(In second para..)
The poet admits that fire and ice both shall end the world.In the last four lines he simply considered what might happen if the earth were to be destroyed by second time ice will be enough to destroy the earth.The poet then compares ice with hater.He says that hatred is also an emotion that he is familiar with and that he knows what kind of danger can arise from hatred,with this knowledge he comes with conclusion that hatred can be a sufficient weapon to destroy the whole world.
★★Hope it will be helpful for you (^_^♪)★★
Answer:
Message-
The poem Fire and Ice by Robert Frost is a metaphor for human feelings of desires and hatred. Fire represents burning desires while ice on the other hand depicts ice cold hatred. It tells us about how we humans will be the end of our own race.
Summary-
The poem expresses the profound idea that the world would end in either of two ways, either by ice or fire. One group is of the opinion that someday the Earth’s core will get so heated up that it would lead to fire destroying the earth’s surface. On the other hand, the second group says that if the temperature goes down to an extent that makes life on Earth impossible, it would have the same catastrophic effect. The poet then compares fire and ice with the destructive features of human emotions; desire and hatred. He says that from what he is aware about “fiery desires”, he would favour the ones who say that it would be fire. By saying so, he brings about the idea that human beings let their emotions rule them and the consequence of unmonitored longing is chaos.
Then by not waving off the first option of fire, he considers if the world has to expire twice, ice would be equally competent in ending it. He brings about a contrast between “ice” and “hatred”. The human capability of insensitivity and hatred has the potential for inner destruction. Though slow and steady, it has the same effect that desire has on us. So if given an option between fire and ice, ice would be just as good as fire to destroy the world.
Hope it helps you.
plz mark it as brainliest.
Explanation: