Can anyone give me an essay on the topic- "spare the rod and spoil the child".
dragon116:
hi sherya please message me it is deepak
Answers
Answered by
7
hi friend
here's your answer looking for
__________________________________________
As nowadays, the parents think that, they can have control on their child by the only way ie. beating.
but is this correct or incorrect?
Actually in some ways it is correct whereas in some ways it's in correct.
As , if the parents are too strict then the child must be in control and even they can teach him everything that they want , very easily. Yeah ,we can say that, this is best way to control the children.
Even if the parents are strict , then the child will be in fear of doing anything wrong that is not in the knowledge of parents.
but , if we see this without strictness then, we can see that , the child will be free for doing anything. Means , he can do anything , whatever he wants to do ,even without in the knowledge of their parents.
And , this is the only reason why nowadays, children start robbery, thefting, smuggling, and don't know how many works.
And because of this fear only the child will think , hundred times for doing anything activity that is not in the knowledge of their parents.
So, some how it is the best way to control their children. and there is one famous line also " spare the rod and spoil the child." . yeah, this is absolutely correct the if, we leave strictness , and start handling the child without that then, the child must become spoil or it will start doing the bad thing ever.
But the thing that should be noted that, the strictness is important but over strictness is something like a ban.
so, over strictness must be avoided.
Yeah , I other words we can say , " strictness is boon to child but over strictness is ban for him".
isn't it?
______________________________________________
hope it helped you
from brainly benefactor
Amaytripathi19
here's your answer looking for
__________________________________________
As nowadays, the parents think that, they can have control on their child by the only way ie. beating.
but is this correct or incorrect?
Actually in some ways it is correct whereas in some ways it's in correct.
As , if the parents are too strict then the child must be in control and even they can teach him everything that they want , very easily. Yeah ,we can say that, this is best way to control the children.
Even if the parents are strict , then the child will be in fear of doing anything wrong that is not in the knowledge of parents.
but , if we see this without strictness then, we can see that , the child will be free for doing anything. Means , he can do anything , whatever he wants to do ,even without in the knowledge of their parents.
And , this is the only reason why nowadays, children start robbery, thefting, smuggling, and don't know how many works.
And because of this fear only the child will think , hundred times for doing anything activity that is not in the knowledge of their parents.
So, some how it is the best way to control their children. and there is one famous line also " spare the rod and spoil the child." . yeah, this is absolutely correct the if, we leave strictness , and start handling the child without that then, the child must become spoil or it will start doing the bad thing ever.
But the thing that should be noted that, the strictness is important but over strictness is something like a ban.
so, over strictness must be avoided.
Yeah , I other words we can say , " strictness is boon to child but over strictness is ban for him".
isn't it?
______________________________________________
hope it helped you
from brainly benefactor
Amaytripathi19
tysm amay
it helped me a lot
welcome Shreya
^ -^
^_^
Similar questions