Can anyone tell me how civil disobedience and Non cooperation were different? aren't they the same because both technically mean disobeying someone?
Answers
Answer:
The civil disobedience movement sought to paralyze the government by breaking a specific set of rules and administration. The Non-Cooperation Movement sought to bring the working of the government to a standstill by not cooperating with the administration.
they aren't same because civil disobedience is directly against the administration and breakes the rules
and non corrporation is stands with administrations but opposes his policies
hope its helpful
Explanation:
Non-cooperation
It was launched on September 5th, 1920 and it ended on 5th February 1922 .
The Non-Cooperation Movement sought to bring the working of the government to a standstill by not cooperating with the administration.
There was large scale participation of Muslim working class in the Non-Cooperation movement.
The non-cooperation movement was geographically confined to certain parts of India.
The movement was called off in 1922 due to the Chauri-Chaura incident (Occurred on Feb 5th, 1922
Civil-Disobedience
It began on March 12, 1930, through the launch of the Salt Satyagraha.
The Civil Disobedience Movement was an attempt at paralysing the administration by breaking some specific rules and regulations.
The Civil-Disobedience movement saw less participation from the Muslim community due to the policy of divide and rule by the British and the communal propaganda of the Muslim League and the Hindu Mahasabha.
The civil disobedience movement saw widespread geographical coverage and mass participation in comparison to the non-cooperation movement.
The movement was withdrawn after the signing of the Gandhi-Irwin pact.