English, asked by vedantsengar1232, 2 months ago

Can Human teachers can replace with robot teachers
write an article​

Answers

Answered by agrim2899
2

Answer:

Explanation:

Writing in Science Robotics, scientists say social robots are proving effective in the teaching of certain narrow subjects, such as vocabulary or prime numbers.

But current technical limitations -- particularly around speech recognition and the ability for social interaction -- mean their role will largely be confined to that of teaching assistants or tutors, at least for the foreseeable future.

The study was led by Professor in Robotics Tony Belpaeme, from the University of Plymouth and Ghent University, who has worked in the field of social robotics for around two decades.

He said: "In recent years scientists have started to build robots for the classroom -- not the robot kits used to learn about technology and mathematics, but social robots that can actually teach. This is because pressures on teaching budgets, and calls for more personalised teaching, have led to a search for technological solutions.

"In the broadest sense, social robots have the potential to become part of the educational infrastructure just like paper, white boards, and computer tablets. But a social robot has the potential to support and challenge students in ways unavailable in current resource-limited educational environments. Robots can free up precious time for teachers, allowing the teacher to focus on what people still do best -- provide a comprehensive, empathic, and rewarding educational experience."

The current study, compiled in conjunction with academics at Yale University and the University of Tsukuba, involved a review of more than 100 published articles, which have shown robots to be effective at increasing outcomes, largely because of their physical presence.

However it also explored in detail some of the technical constraints highlighting that speech recognition, for example, is still insufficiently robust to allow the robot to understand spoken utterances from young children.

It also says that introducing social robots into the school curriculum would pose significant logistical challenges and might in fact carry risks, with some children being seen to rely too heavily on the help offered by robots rather than simply using them when they are in difficulty.

In their conclusion, the authors add: "Next to the practical considerations of introducing robots in education, there are also ethical issues. How far do we want the education of our children to be delegated to machines? Overall, learners are positive about their experiences, but parents and teaching staff adopt a more cautious attitude.

"Notwithstanding that, robots show great promise when teaching restricted topics with the effects almost matching those of human tutoring. So although the use of robots in educational settings is limited by technical and logistical challenges for now, it is highly likely that classrooms of the future will feature robots that assist a human teacher."

HOPE IT HELPS YOU MATE!!!

Answered by Sweetoldsoul
1

CAN Human Teachers be replaced by Robots ?

The clear answer to the big question is "NO !" Human teachers can not be replaced by robots. Guidance from a human educator is always needed by a child to help them develop emotionally and mentally. Teachers are an essential part of every functional society. Without their effort and skill in education, children would not grow up to be productive, well-adjusted adults.

Education is not only teaching the various laws of motion but also its about learning skills and knowledge. Through education, the knowledge of society, country, and of the world is passed on from generation to generation. This may include education in morality, for example learning how to act as loyal, honest and effective citizen. It's also important for educators to teach ways to find and use information.

A robot is a machine (just a machine) that is capable of carrying out complex series of actions. A robot may sort out a mathematics problem in just a few seconds but it can not answer students' questions which are not related to the one concept being taught. Whereas, a teacher often go across boundaries and explain seemingly unrelated concepts to help students understand a particular lesson or instill in them the value of a particular skill. Many of these are directly caused by students asking complex questions to which there is no simple answer.

While learning is necessary, it’s not the only reason kids need to go to school. Children also need to learn how to socialize in a responsible and well-adjusted manner, and there is no better source to learn that from than human adults.

Learning how to interact with others and behave appropriately in the many environments in which you’ll find yourself through life is arguably just as important as the information you learn in school. This can not be expected from a robot.

A good teacher imparts vital qualities that a robot would be unable to teach in a meaningful way. A robot can be helpful in teaching narrow concepts which do not lead to hard-to-answer questions. Examples of such concepts are vocabulary and prime numbers. For example, imagine a student asking, "How do I spell the plural version of this word? (The robot could give the plural version).

A robot can help in several concepts but can NEVER replace a teacher who helps the student to be motivated and to chase their dreams.

Similar questions