History, asked by thatonebtsfan3, 8 months ago

Can I get an essay on "What Were the Primary Reasons for the 'Fall' of Rome?"

Answers

Answered by Anonymous
1

Answer:

The main reason of fall of Rome :

  • poor leadership
  • natural disasters and famines
  • foreign invasions
  • Rome's army took up much of their budget and resources, thus weakening them.
  • The leaders forgot about the importance of debating and compromising, so they became dictators to get what they wanted.
  • The upper class indulged in their luxury causing them to get softer and it was no longer about sacrificing oneself to Rome.
  • Foreign Invaders noticed they got weaker and attacked Rome.
Answered by amm201178
1

PLS MARK AS BRILLIANT

Explanation:

What Were the Primary Reasons for the “Fall” of Rome? By 200 BC, Rome was quickly becoming one of the world’s greatest empires with their excellent military conquering territory from modern day Scotland to Spain. After the Punic Wars and the defeat of Carthage, Rome had full control of the Mediterranean region, establishing colonies in North Africa, Egypt, the Middle East, and Asia Minor. Julius Caesar became Rome’s first emperor using his military influence. Under his reign, Rome shifted from a republic to an empire under the rule of an emperor and the military. Rome steadily increased in stability, power, and wealth, reaching Pax Romana (the time of Roman peace) under Emperor Augustus Caesar. Rome was forced to discover, as many other…show more content…

These Germanic soldiers were not loyal to Rome and were therefore not as motivated to keep Rome afloat.  Because of the undersized, lethargic Roman military and its aggressive opposition, Rome was very much open to foreign invasions. By the fifth century, the “powerhouse of the Mediterranean” was struggling to protect itself with its decreased population, apathetic military, and leaders with debauched morals. Outside of the Roman Empire, Germanic tribes took notice of the internal chaos and began invading the empire’s borders. Many of the tribes were cruel and combative, such as the Huns. The Huns “exceed any definition of savagery” and were “fired with an overwhelming desire for seizing the property of others, these swift-moving and ungovernable people make their destructive way amid the pillage and slaughter of those who live around them.” (Document D, excerpts about an Asian tribe called the Huns from Roman History by Ammianus Marcellinus). Roman soldiers would have had a challenge ahead of them if they had to deal with the Huns at the height of the Roman military, let alone having to fight them when their numbers were depleted and motivation running low. The Huns played a large part in minimizing what little hope Rome had of reviving itself into the Mediterranean-dominating empire it once was.

Similar questions