Can u plz prove this accordingly?
Attachments:
Answers
Answered by
5
This is kind of very basic question belonging to limits chapter. We just require to check if RHL = LHL or not,if yes then limit exists else it DNE. There's really nothing as such complicated to show or prove.
Since the piece wise defined f(x) has a modulus involved when x ≠ 0,we need to see how the function will behave at x > 0 and x < 0.
f (x) = x - x/ x for x > 0
f(x) = x + x /x for x < 0
and f (x) = 2 for x = 0
Now, let's find the RHL and LHL and see if the RHL = LHL or not.
RHL :
For lim x → 0+ :
=> x-x/x
=> 0
So,RHL = 0
Now let's check LHL,
For lim x → 0-
=> x + x/x
=> 2x/x
=> 2
So,RHL = 0 and LHL = 2,which concludes RHL ≠ LHL.
•°• lim x → 0 f(x) does not exist.
Similar questions