Can u plzzz give any five opposer's point about a debate and its motion States that:
TECHNOLOGY HAS BROUGHT DISADVANTAGE THAN ADVANTAGE
Answers
Point 1. Society Is Based on Technology — But Technology Isn’t Certain
01-tech-in-classroom-tech-is-everywhere
The first big point in the tech-in-the-classroom debate is that technology is everywhere.
Every person has a smartphone that’s capable of accessing nearly every single bit of information known to humanity — and it fits in someone’s pocket!
This little electronic miracle is just one of the technological marvels that permeate everyday life, especially for young students.
Televisions, smartphones, computers — there are rarely moments where they’re not looking at a screen.
There’s actually an advantage to all of that electronic input. These devices are the future, and students who learn how to use them will probably have an easier time using more advanced technology in the workplace.
But there’s a downside to this technology, too.
Namely, it doesn’t always work.
A battery can die. A cellular network can go down. An area of the country may not get service.
Overall, there are a lot of variables that go into making modern technology work. If one of them fails, then the technology also fails (or at least loses functionality).
For individuals who are connected 24/7 to their friends, entertainment, and education, one of those failures suddenly isolates someone from major parts of their lives.
That’s why opponents of technology in the classroom say it goes too far. All it takes is one fragile piece of the puzzle to break, and the whole digital system of accessibility crumbles with it.
Deciding Questions: Is technology reliable enough to keep students connected to tech-based education?
Point 2. Students Already Use Technology — But They Don’t Have to in a Classroom
02-tech-in-classroom-students-already-use-technology
Like we said in the previous section, nearly every student has already incorporated technology into their everyday life.
Supporters of tech in the classroom say that this makes it a no-brainer to digitize parts of education.
After all, if students are already using their smartphones and computers, why not have them do some schoolwork to be productive?
The results of this ideology are strikingly positive. Specifically, this kind of education is called blended learning, and it helps teachers reach a variety of students who learn in different ways.
Some students may learn from traditional lecture, others may need hands-on time, and others may need to complete interactive activities.
Regardless, tech in the classroom helps teachers differentiate their instruction for the best possible results when it comes to information retention and assessment success.
So why isn’t everyone on board with students using technology to learn?
Electronics — especially smartphones — are distracting in the classroom. If you teach on the same gadgets that students use to distract themselves, how can you be sure that students are learning?
In fact, having “tech off time” in a classroom is an excellent classroom management strategy if your students spend a little too much time looking at screens.
To make matters worse, too much screen time can damage a developing brain. This means using screen-based technology in the classroom may be dangerous to the physical development of students, especially if they’re young!
Technology plays a big enough role in people’s lives — especially children and teens. The classroom can give them a break from it all.
Deciding Question: Is technology valuable enough to use it to help students learn? Or should the classroom be a relief from the constantly-connected online world?
HOPE IT HELPED
PLEASE MARK ME AS BRAINILST
Answer:
- Immense expenditures – ...
- Insufficient methods of teaching- ...
- Transforming learners into inefficient learners- ...
- Waste of valuable time- ...
- Misguided by the wrong information- ...
- Majorsources of distractions- ...
- Creating enough room for cheating-
Explanation:
Pls mark as brainliest, rate, thank and follow me ✌️✌️✌️