Question

Carl Rogers believed that a person’s conflicts can be resolved if he receives unconditional positive regard from another person. Do you agree with the notion or not? Give logical arguments to support your answer.

Answer 1

Yes, a conflict can be resolved if an individual receives positive regard from another individual

• An unconditional positive regard is a client- centric theory by Carl Rogers according to which, a conflict can be resolved in the presence of positive regard from others.
• According to Rogers, unconditional constructive consideration means giving a person's full support and approval regardless the person's behaviour.
• Anyhow, whatever a person does or says, it has to be acknowledged and the client is to be respected by putting no conditions on this acceptance.
• This means that Roger supports the client, whether they convey "good" or "bad" behaviors and emotions

Answer 2

Answer:

• Carl Rogers (1902-1987) was a humanistic analyst who concurred with the fundamental suppositions of Abraham Maslow. Be that as it may, Rogers (1959) added that for an individual to "develop", they need a situation that furnishes them with validity (transparency and self-exposure), acknowledgment (being seen with unequivocal positive respect), and compassion (being tuned in to and comprehended).  

• Without these, connections and sound characters won't create as they should, much like a tree won't develop without daylight and water.  

• Rogers accepted that each individual could accomplish their objectives, wishes, and wants throughout everyday life. When, or rather on the off chance that they did as such, self realization occurred.  

• This was one of Carl Rogers most significant commitments to brain research, and for an individual to arrive at their likely various components must be fulfilled.  

• Rogers dismissed the deterministic idea of both therapy and behaviorism and kept up that we act as we do in light of the manner in which we see our circumstance. "As nobody else can know how we see, we are simply the best specialists."  

• Carl Rogers (1959) accepted that people have one essential intention, that is simply the propensity realize - i.e., to satisfy one's latent capacity and accomplish the most elevated level of 'human-beingness' we can.  

• Like a bloom that will develop to its maximum capacity if the conditions are correct, yet which is obliged by its condition, so individuals will prosper and arrive at their latent capacity if their condition is sufficient.  

• In any case, in contrast to a bloom, the capability of the individual human is one of a kind, and we are intended to create in various manners as indicated by our character. Rogers accepted that individuals are naturally acceptable and innovative.  

• They become damaging just when a helpless self-idea or outer requirements supersede the esteeming procedure. Carl Rogers accepted that for an individual to accomplish self-realization they should be in a condition of consistency.  

• This implies self-completion happens when an individual's "optimal self" (i.e., who they might want to be) is consistent with their real conduct (mental self portrait).  

• Rogers depicts a person who is completing as a completely working individual. The primary determinant of whether we will become self-realized is youth experience.