Case study of nuclear disater
Answers
Answered by
2
A nuclear
and radiation accident is defined by the International
Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
as "an event that has led to significant consequences to people,
the environment or the facility." Examples include lethal
effects to individuals, large
radioactivity release to
the environment,
or reactor
core melt." The
prime example of a "major nuclear accident" is one in which
a reactor
core is
damaged and significant amounts of radioactivity are
released, such as in the Chernobyl
disaster in
1986.
The
impact of nuclear accidents has been a topic of debate practically
since the first nuclear
reactors were
constructed in 1954. It has also been a key factor in public
concern about nuclear facilities.Some
technical measures to reduce the risk of accidents or to minimize the
amount of radioactivity released to the environment have been
adopted. Despite the use of such measures, human
errorremains,
and "there have been many accidents with varying impacts as well
near misses and incidents".
Worldwide
there have been 99 accidents at nuclear power plants. Fifty-seven
accidents have occurred since the Chernobyl disaster, and 57% (56 out
of 99) of all nuclear-related accidents have occurred in the
USA.Serious nuclear
power plant accidents
include theFukushima
Daiichi nuclear disaster (2011),
Chernobyl disaster (1986), Three
Mile Island accident (1979),
and the SL-1 accident
(1961).
Answered by
2
The failure occurred when the plant was hit by a tsunami that had been triggered by the magnitude 9.0 Tōhoku earthquake. The following day, 12 March, substantial amounts of radioactive material began to be released,creating the largest nuclear incident since the Chernobyl disaster in April 1986 and the only (after Chernobyl) to measure Level 7 on the International Nuclear Event Scale[9] (initially releasing an estimated 10–30% of the earlier incident's radioactivity). In August 2013, it was stated[by whom?] that the significant amount of radioactive water was among the most pressing problems affecting the cleanup process, which is expected to take decades. There have been continued spills of contaminated water at the plant, some into the sea. Plant workers are trying to contain the leaks using measures such as building chemical underground walls, but they have not yet improved the situation significantly. Nonetheless, to keep the matter in perspective, the entire release of radioactivity into the sea will add less than 0.01% to the background radiation.
Similar questions