Case study on Diagonal communication.
emmanuelkwaku14:
Please can someone help me with answer my assignment about a case study on diagonal communication
Answers
Answered by
1
Hey mate!
Here is your answer
3 |Page
1.0)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This data analysis report is written to examine the relevant horizontal and diagonalcommunication flow practices that exist in the CIMB Group Holdings Berhad. The mainreference for the analysis is primarily based on the CIMB Group Annual Report 2012. Thecontent analysis will be thoroughly illustrated through the projected situations based on theactivities conducted by the organization that utilized both horizontal and diagonalcommunication flow via the proposed channel which simultaneously lead towards advantagesand disadvantages in the internal organization atmosphere.
2.0)
INTRODUCTION
Horizontal communication is a type of communication that flows across the organizationfrom peer to peer in which most social interaction takes place within the formal organization(McCroskey & McCroskey, 2005). According to Tu
rkalj & Fosić (2010), horizontalcommunication can be defined as communication that “appears among people of the same statuswithin a department or among different working units” whereas diagonal communication“appears among people of the different
status who are not formally connected in the
organizational communication system” (Turkalj & Fosić, 2010, p. 36)
.According to Lunnenburg (2010), horizontal communication can be characterized asinformational c
ommunication practice where the main function is “to tie together activities
within or across departments on a single school campus or within divisions in a school-wideorganizational system (Lunenburg, 2010, p. 5). Fall into three main categories, Cannary (2011)categorized the main function of horizontal communication in three categories which areIntradepartmental problem solving, Interdepartmental coordination and Staff Advice to Line

4 |Page
Departments. The main function of horizontal communication is to facilitate the communication
process in two condition where according to Nousiainen (2008), “There are more employees thanmanagers” and “employees at the same level feel more comfortable talking with each other than
with peo
ple at different authority levels”
(Nousiainen, 2008).There are certain advantages related to this communication flow in which the employeecan exercise open conversation, discuss work-related issue and problems, establish long-lastinginterpersonal relationships and better chance of survival in the organization while simultaneouslyheightened the knowledge, communication skills, and socialization skills (Nousiainen, 2008).According to Boyaci (2004), from horizontal and cross communication
practices, “
employeessee their colleagues as informative, problem-solving, cooperative both in and other departments
”
(Boyaci, 2004, p. 685). Below is the revised framework model of Horizontal InformationProcessing, proposed by Daft & Lengel in (1984).Figure 1: Revised Framework Model of Horizontal Information Processing, proposed by Daft &Lengel in (1984).

Here is your answer
3 |Page
1.0)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This data analysis report is written to examine the relevant horizontal and diagonalcommunication flow practices that exist in the CIMB Group Holdings Berhad. The mainreference for the analysis is primarily based on the CIMB Group Annual Report 2012. Thecontent analysis will be thoroughly illustrated through the projected situations based on theactivities conducted by the organization that utilized both horizontal and diagonalcommunication flow via the proposed channel which simultaneously lead towards advantagesand disadvantages in the internal organization atmosphere.
2.0)
INTRODUCTION
Horizontal communication is a type of communication that flows across the organizationfrom peer to peer in which most social interaction takes place within the formal organization(McCroskey & McCroskey, 2005). According to Tu
rkalj & Fosić (2010), horizontalcommunication can be defined as communication that “appears among people of the same statuswithin a department or among different working units” whereas diagonal communication“appears among people of the different
status who are not formally connected in the
organizational communication system” (Turkalj & Fosić, 2010, p. 36)
.According to Lunnenburg (2010), horizontal communication can be characterized asinformational c
ommunication practice where the main function is “to tie together activities
within or across departments on a single school campus or within divisions in a school-wideorganizational system (Lunenburg, 2010, p. 5). Fall into three main categories, Cannary (2011)categorized the main function of horizontal communication in three categories which areIntradepartmental problem solving, Interdepartmental coordination and Staff Advice to Line

4 |Page
Departments. The main function of horizontal communication is to facilitate the communication
process in two condition where according to Nousiainen (2008), “There are more employees thanmanagers” and “employees at the same level feel more comfortable talking with each other than
with peo
ple at different authority levels”
(Nousiainen, 2008).There are certain advantages related to this communication flow in which the employeecan exercise open conversation, discuss work-related issue and problems, establish long-lastinginterpersonal relationships and better chance of survival in the organization while simultaneouslyheightened the knowledge, communication skills, and socialization skills (Nousiainen, 2008).According to Boyaci (2004), from horizontal and cross communication
practices, “
employeessee their colleagues as informative, problem-solving, cooperative both in and other departments
”
(Boyaci, 2004, p. 685). Below is the revised framework model of Horizontal InformationProcessing, proposed by Daft & Lengel in (1984).Figure 1: Revised Framework Model of Horizontal Information Processing, proposed by Daft &Lengel in (1984).

Similar questions
Math,
7 months ago
English,
7 months ago
Math,
7 months ago
Science,
1 year ago
Computer Science,
1 year ago
Psychology,
1 year ago