Question

Chapter : From Trade to Territory

♨️ Question: ♨️

In what way was the administration of the Company different from that
of Indian rulers?

Note :-

➸ No copied answer ❌❌

➸ Spam = Report

➸Only who knows those only answer.

➸If possible brainy stars and moderators plz help.

Thank you!! ​​​

Answer 1

Answer:

Hope it helps!! Mark this answer as brainliest if u found it useful and follow me for quick and accurate answers...

Explanation:

The administration of the Company was different from that of the Indian rulers in the following ways:

• The Company divided its administrative units called Presidencies. There were three Presidencies – Bengal, Madras and Bombay. In India, districts were the main administrative units.

• Each presidency was ruled by a Governor. Districts were ruled by the Collectors.

• The supreme head of the administration of the Company was the Governor-General. But in India, the head of the administration was the king.

• The main job of the Governor-General was to introduce administrative reforms while the main job of the Collector was to collect revenue and taxes- and maintain law and order in his district

________________________________

Answer 2

Answer:

The difference in the administration of the company and that of the Indian rulers is given below:

Company Administration :

• The company divided the territories into presidencies.
• Governor ruled the administrative units.
• Governor-General was the head of the state.
• The introduction of several acts : Regulating Act, Indian Council Acts and Montague-Chelmsford Reforms.

Indian Rulers Administration:

• Indian rulers divided the territories into district, pargana, tehsil and parishad.
• Zamindar or Peasants were responsible for their units.
• King or Nawab was the head of the state.
• Indian rulers brought no such acts but used to rule with their farmans.