Question

cite examples of how philosophy can be a principle of sufficient reasons or non contradiction​

Answer 1

Answer:

Sufficient reason is a standard by which an argument is shown to be adequately consistent and coherent to ensure its validity (that if all of its premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true).

Explanation:

Philosophy isn’t a principle of anything. The question makes no sense. The principles of sufficient reason and non-contradiction are logical principles essential to philosophy, not the other way around.To put it simply —

The Principle of Sufficient Reason (PSR) is that "anything, to exist, must have a reason."

In other words: "for anything to exist, something else must have first existed."

Another term for the PSR is “contingency.”

The ancient Greeks put it this way: "nothing comes from nothing."

The main purpose of PSR is to eliminate random guesswork from scientific inquiry.

The strong version of PSR allows no exceptions. The mild version of PSR allows for at least one exception, e.g. God, or the conditions for the Big Bang..

Here are some very simple examples of PSR:

Socrates, to exist, requires that his parents first existed.

Democratic Republics, to exist, require that a national revolution replacing their monarchies first existed.

Geometric shapes, to exist, require that Natural Law first exists.

It is obvious that most facts have countless causes. Yet we need only one to satisfy the PSR.

Answer 2

Philosophy can be a system of sufficient or non-existent reasons:

The principle of reason enough states that everything should have a cause or a cause.

The goal was stated and made clear by Gottfried and many precursors and was re-used and developed by Arthur Schopenhauer and Sir William Hamilton, 9th Baronet.

• The adequate Reasoning Principle is a powerful and contradictory philosophical principle that states that everything must have a cause, a cause, or a basis.
• This simple need for continuous understanding brings out some of the boldest and most challenging ideas in philosophical history.
• If you accept an unlimited Reason for Policy (= PSR) form, you will need an explanation for any facts, or in other words, you will deny the possibility of any malicious, or unexplained facts.
• As we can clearly see in this example, the principle of non-contradiction is a counterfeit hypothesis, because it causes the mind to believe that there is a direct benefit to human judgment, and therefore the mind finds stock in an axiom created by itself.