History, asked by lokenderpalsingh17, 10 months ago

collect information about various kings for medieval period and make a collage for them

Answers

Answered by dangerousboss
14

Answer:

Answer:

India has a rich history especially the middle age has seen some great rulers throughout the nation. The time period between 700 AD to 1200 AD have seen some noticeable rulers like:

1. King Nagabhatta I and king Vastsaraj. Both were from the Protihara dynasty.

2. King Dharmapala and King Devapala. They both were from Bengal, from the Sena dynasty.

3. King Amaraja and king Pritvi Raj Singh Chauhan. They both belonged to the Rajput dynasty; from the Chauhan dynasty. The Chauhan dynasty was one of the most important dynasty in the middle history of India.

Answered by dharanikamadasl
0

Answer:

The ten well-known emperors who influenced mediaeval India's history are as follows:

1. Mahmud of Ghazni

2. Sultan Muiz-Ud-Din Muhammad of Ghur

3. Qutb-Ud-Din Aibak

4. Sultan Iltutmish

5. Ghiyas-Ud-Din Balban

6. Jalal-Ud-Din Firozshah Khalji

7. Ala-Ud-Din Khalji

8. Qutb-Ud-Din Mubarak Khalji

9. Nasir-Ud-Din Khusrav Shah

10. Ghiyas-Ud-Din Tughlaq Shah.

Explanation:

1. Mahmud of Ghazni:

  • The Yamini dynasty, also known as the Ghaznavi dynasty, claimed to have descended from a Persian ruling line.
  • The family fled to Turkistan during the Arab invasion and assimilated into the Turks.
  • The family is now recognized as being Turkish.
  • This dynasty's autonomous kingdom was established by Alptigin.
  • In 963 A.D., he slew Amir Abu-Bakr Lawik and stole the kingdom of Jabul with its capital city of Ghazni.
  • His son Ishaq succeeded him, but he only held power for three years.
  • The Turkish army's commander, Balkatigin, then took control of the throne.
  • In the year 972 A.D., Balkatigin's slave Pirai took over.

2. Sultan Muiz-Ud-Din Muhammad of Ghur:

  • One is frequently inclined to compare Muhammad of Ghur's accomplishments and qualities to those of Mahmud of Ghazni, which occasionally unfairly downplays the importance of Muhammad of Ghur.
  • However, Muhammad's place in Indian history is undeniable, even when compared to Mahmud.

3. Qutb-Ud-Din Aibak:

  • Qutb-ud-din The true architect of Turkish control in India was Aibak.
  • He was primarily to blame for Sultan Muhammad's triumph in India.
  • Muhammad was in charge of Turkey's invasion of India, but he was unable to stay and solidify his gains.
  • Qutb-ud-din was mostly responsible for it. When Muhammad passed away, Qutb-ud-din persuaded the Turkish nobility in India to recognize his rule, solidified his position through matrimonial alliances with powerful rival chiefs, and obstinately refused to submit to Yildiz's rule, drove him out of Punjab, and shielded his young kingdom from Central Asian politics.
  • He was therefore successful in maintaining the Delhi Sultanate's separate and independent position using both diplomacy and force.

4. Sultan Iltutmish:

  • Iltutmish was a well-educated and devout person.
  • He was a valiant soldier, an accomplished commander, and a competent manager.
  • Additionally, he was a wise, prudent, and foresighted statesman.
  • He was an owner's slave.
  • However, he rose to the position of Sultan of Delhi on the strength of his own accomplishments and efforts.

5. Ghiyas-Ud-Din Balban:

  • Although Sultan Masud Shah and Sultan Nasir-ud-din were both his sons-in-law and his own son, Bughra Khan, was married to the daughter of Sultan Nasir-ud-din by his other wife, it is obvious that Balban was closely related to the Iltutmish dynasty.
  • Balban laid the foundation for a new dynasty known as the Balbani.

6. Jalal-Ud-Din Firozshah Khalji:

  • Without a doubt, the Khaljis were Turks.
  • They were viewed as Turks by Fakhruddin, the author of Tarikh-i-Fakhruddin Mubarakshahi, Raverty, and Barthold, among others.
  • At that time, the people who lived in the Helmand valley in Afghanistan were known as the Khaljis, as was the region of that valley.

7. Ala-ud-din Khalji:

  • The kings of mediaeval India place Ala-ud-din in a prominent position.
  • At the age of thirty, he has crowned Sultan, and within fifteen years, he had risen to become India's most powerful tsar.
  • Ala-ud-accomplishment din's throughout his lifetime were exceptional in terms of the expansion and management of the empire.
  • "From nought, he ascended to be one of the greatest kings of mediaeval India," writes Dr K.S. Lal.

8. Qutb-Ud-Din Mubarak Khalji:

  • Ala-ud-din had designated his younger son Shihab-ud-din Umar as his successor under the persuasion of Malik Kafur.
  • Shihab-ud-din wasn't much older than five or six.
  • As a result, Kafur took over as his regent and the state's de facto leader.

9. Nasir-Ud-Din Khusrav Shah:

  • A converted Muslim, Khusrav Shah was backed by Gujarati Hindu warriors.
  • His worst mistake was that.
  • Despite having been converted to Islam as a young kid, displaying religious fervor throughout his campaign in the South, and assuming the title of "commander of the faithful," his adversaries labelled him an "enemy of Islam" and said that under his leadership "Islam was in peril."

10. Ghiyas-Ud-Din Tughlaq Shah:

  • Sultan Ghiyas-ud-din was regarded by modern historians as the ideal Muslim tsar.
  • Their main justification for this is that they believe he preserved Islam in India from Mongol invasions and restored Islam's glory by ending Khusrav Shah's dominion.
  • Sultan Ghiyas-ud-din, however, can only be regarded from this perspective as the defender of Islam.
  • He did, however, have many other attributes. 

#SPJ2

Similar questions