Question

Cologne Ltd. is a large consumer products company. The incumbent CEO of the company left and Mr. Chatterzi, who was second in command to the CEO, took over as CEO of the company. Mr. Talwar is a senior executive in the company and has his own views. He has after all been in the business for a decade and a half and he thinks he knows how to tackle the slump the industry is going through. He did not wasted time and talked to the new CEO and told him what he thought needed to be done in the company. The CEO heard him out and suggested that he give him some time to learn the ropes. Eventually when he did lay out his plant, Mr. Talwar was shocked to see all his suggestions completely ignored. When he asked the CEO about this, he responded cryptically that he wanted a team that supported him completely and hinted that Mr. Talwar leave the company if he was unhappy. He actually ventured far enough to offer his assistance in finding a new job for Talwar. Mr. Talwar was shocked. He did not understand What to do. One option was not to take it personally. It was probably just a mismatch between his and the CEO's style of functioning. The other option was to gracefully bow out while he still retains the goodwill of the organization and colleagues. He should start exploring opportunities elsewhere and take up the offer that suits him the best. He is still undecided between these two options. a) Do you think the CEO has decided that Talwar does not fit into his team and that is why he has asked him to quit? (15) b) Which option should Mr. Talwar follows, in your opinion?

Answer 1

Answer:

Colonial period (a period in a country's history where it was subject to management by a colonial power) may refer to: Spanish conquest of Guatemala. Viceroyalty of Peru. Colonial history of the United States. British Raj, British colonial rule in India, 1858 to 1947.

Answer 2

Answer:

a) No

b) second option

Explanation:

a) The CEO just learnt about the company. His work style and ethics are different from that of Mr. Talwar. It was just a disagreement on an issue and is completely normal. Moreover, the CEO did not fire him or force him to quit , he just suggested.

b) In my opinion, Mr. Talwar should follow the second option that is to continue his present job and still search for better jobs where his ideas will be valued.